mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unveiling Bias in Fairness Evaluations of Large Language Models: A Critical Literature Review of Music and Movie Recommendation Systems

arXiv 2401.04057 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2024cs.IR cs.AI cs.SEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of generative artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), has intensified the imperative to scrutinize fairness alongside accuracy. Recent studies have begun to investigate fairness evaluations for LLMs within domains such as recommendations. Given that personalization is an intrinsic aspect of recommendation systems, its incorporation into fairness assessments is paramount. Yet, the degree to which current fairness evaluation frameworks account for personalization remains unclear. Our comprehensive literature review aims to fill this gap by examining how existing frameworks handle fairness evaluations of LLMs, with a focus on the integration of personalization factors. Despite an exhaustive collection and analysis of relevant works, we discovered that most evaluations overlook personalization, a critical facet of recommendation systems, thereby inadvertently perpetuating unfair practices. Our findings shed light on this oversight and underscore the urgent need for more nuanced fairness evaluations that acknowledge personalization. Such improvements are vital for fostering equitable development within the AI community.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.

Builds on

25 of 29 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  2. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  3. 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 378
  4. 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 335
  5. 2023LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendationcited by 171
  6. 2023Macaw-LLM: Multi-Modal Language Modeling with Image, Audio, Video, and Text Integrationcited by 168
  7. 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 166
  8. 2023Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendationscited by 130
  9. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
  10. 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 91
  11. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
  12. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
13 more
  1. 2023LLM-Rec: Personalized Recommendation via Prompting Large Language Modelscited by 77
  2. 2023Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Frameworkcited by 69
  3. 2023Leveraging Large Language Models in Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 63
  4. 2021One Chatbot Per Person: Creating Personalized Chatbots based on Implicit User Profilescited by 39
  5. 2023UP5: Unbiased Foundation Model for Fairness-aware Recommendationcited by 38
  6. 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applicationscited by 27
  7. 2022Evaluating Psychological Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 26
  8. 2023Editing Personality for Large Language Modelscited by 22
  9. 2023Fairness of ChatGPTcited by 19
  10. 2023A Preliminary Study of ChatGPT on News Recommendation: Personalization, Provider Fairness, Fake Newscited by 19
  11. 2021Fairness-aware Personalized Ranking Recommendation via Adversarial Learningcited by 3
  12. 2019Modeling Artist Preferences of Users with Different Music Consumption Patterns for Fair Music Recommendationscited by 1
  13. 2023Personality Profiling: How informative are social media profiles in predicting personal information?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.