mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Augmentation-Free Graph Contrastive Learning with Performance Guarantee

arXiv 2204.04874 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.SIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) is the most representative and prevalent self-supervised learning approach for graph-structured data. Despite its remarkable success, existing GCL methods highly rely on an augmentation scheme to learn the representations invariant across different augmentation views. In this work, we revisit such a convention in GCL through examining the effect of augmentation techniques on graph data via the lens of spectral theory. We found that graph augmentations preserve the low-frequency components and perturb the middle-and high-frequency components of the graph, which contributes to the success of GCL algorithms on homophilic graphs but hinder its application on heterophilic graphs, due to the high-frequency preference of heterophilic data. Motivated by this, we propose a novel, theoretically-principled, and augmentation-free GCL method, named AF-GCL, that (1) leverages the features aggregated by Graph Neural Network to construct the self-supervision signal instead of augmentations and therefore (2) is less sensitive to the graph homophily degree. Theoretically, We present the performance guarantee for AF-GCL as well as an analysis for understanding the efficacy of AF-GCL. Extensive experiments on 14 benchmark datasets with varying degrees of heterophily show that AF-GCL presents competitive or better performance on homophilic graphs and outperforms all existing state-of-the-art GCL methods on heterophilic graphs with significantly less computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.

Builds on

45 of 61 references.

References · 45

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  7. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  9. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  10. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  11. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  12. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
33 more
  1. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  2. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  3. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
  4. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
  5. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
  6. 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 821
  7. 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 651
  8. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  9. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
  10. 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 535
  11. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  12. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
  13. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  14. 2020GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-Trainingcited by 461
  15. 2021Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 361
  16. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  17. 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 309
  18. 2019Revisiting Graph Neural Networks: All We Have is Low-Pass Filterscited by 260
  19. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  20. 2020Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 217
  21. 2021Self-Supervised Learning of Graph Neural Networks: A Unified Reviewcited by 184
  22. 2021Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?cited by 182
  23. 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
  24. 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
  25. 2018Contextual Stochastic Block Modelscited by 134
  26. 2021An Empirical Study of Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 113
  27. 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
  28. 2020Transfer Learning of Graph Neural Networks with Ego-graph Information Maximizationcited by 93
  29. 2021New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphscited by 81
  30. 2021Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 70
  31. 2021Twitch Gamers: a Dataset for Evaluating Proximity Preserving and Structural Role-based Node Embeddingscited by 48
  32. 2021Augmentations in Graph Contrastive Learning: Current Methodological Flaws & Towards Better Practicescited by 24
  33. 2021Beyond Low-Pass Filters: Adaptive Feature Propagation on Graphscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 10; 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: