mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Off-Policy Evaluation with Online Adaptation for Robot Exploration in Challenging Environments

arXiv 2204.03140 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2022cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous exploration has many important applications. However, classic information gain-based or frontier-based exploration only relies on the robot current state to determine the immediate exploration goal, which lacks the capability of predicting the value of future states and thus leads to inefficient exploration decisions. This paper presents a method to learn how "good" states are, measured by the state value function, to provide a guidance for robot exploration in real-world challenging environments. We formulate our work as an off-policy evaluation (OPE) problem for robot exploration (OPERE). It consists of offline Monte-Carlo training on real-world data and performs Temporal Difference (TD) online adaptation to optimize the trained value estimator. We also design an intrinsic reward function based on sensor information coverage to enable the robot to gain more information with sparse extrinsic rewards. Results show that our method enables the robot to predict the value of future states so as to better guide robot exploration. The proposed algorithm achieves better prediction and exploration performance compared with the state-of-the-arts. To the best of our knowledge, this work for the first time demonstrates value function prediction on real-world dataset for robot exploration in challenging subterranean and urban environments. More details and demo videos can be found at https://jeffreyyh.github.io/opere/.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2022.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  2. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  5. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  6. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
  7. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 309
  8. 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 286
  9. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
  10. 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
  11. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  12. 2015Incentivizing Exploration In Reinforcement Learning With Deep Predictive Modelscited by 154
10 more
  1. 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
  2. 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
  3. 2019Learning Exploration Policies for Navigationcited by 116
  4. 2018Episodic Curiosity through Reachabilitycited by 109
  5. 2021Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 89
  6. 2021Goal-Driven Autonomous Exploration Through Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  7. 2020Autonomous Exploration Under Uncertainty via Deep Reinforcement Learning on Graphscited by 30
  8. 2020A Multi-Resolution Frontier-Based Planner for Autonomous 3D Explorationcited by 12
  9. 2021Focus on Impact: Indoor Exploration with Intrinsic Motivationcited by 9
  10. 2020Visual Memorability for Robotic Interestingness via Unsupervised Online Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

7 papers.