mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CipherDAug: Ciphertext based Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2204.00665 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel data-augmentation technique for neural machine translation based on ROT-k ciphertexts. ROT-k is a simple letter substitution cipher that replaces a letter in the plaintext with the kth letter after it in the alphabet. We first generate multiple ROT-k ciphertexts using different values of k for the plaintext which is the source side of the parallel data. We then leverage this enciphered training data along with the original parallel data via multi-source training to improve neural machine translation. Our method, CipherDAug, uses a co-regularization-inspired training procedure, requires no external data sources other than the original training data, and uses a standard Transformer to outperform strong data augmentation techniques on several datasets by a significant margin. This technique combines easily with existing approaches to data augmentation, and yields particularly strong results in low-resource settings.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2022.

Builds on

44 of 66 references.

References · 44

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  8. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  9. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  10. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
  11. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  12. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
32 more
  1. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  2. 2019BPE-Dropout: Simple and Effective Subword Regularizationcited by 189
  3. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  4. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  5. 2013A Survey on Multi-view Learningcited by 152
  6. 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 125
  7. 2019Understanding and Improving Transformer From a Multi-Particle Dynamic System Point of Viewcited by 108
  8. 2018Rapid Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to New Languagescited by 82
  9. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
  10. 2017Data Noising as Smoothing in Neural Network Language Modelscited by 78
  11. 2016Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16cited by 76
  12. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  13. 2018SwitchOut: an Efficient Data Augmentation Algorithm for Neural Machine Translationcited by 72
  14. 2020Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentationcited by 71
  15. 2019Investigating Multilingual NMT Representations at Scalecited by 68
  16. 2019Generalized Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Translationcited by 53
  17. 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
  18. 2019Soft Contextual Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
  19. 2019compare-mt: A Tool for Holistic Comparison of Language Generation Systemscited by 43
  20. 2021Multi-view Subword Regularizationcited by 40
  21. 2021BERT, mBERT, or BiBERT? A Study on Contextualized Embeddings for Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  22. 2019A Call for Prudent Choice of Subword Merge Operations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 30
  23. 2019Multilingual Neural Machine Translation With Soft Decoupled Encodingcited by 21
  24. 2021Rethinking Perturbations in Encoder-Decoders for Fast Trainingcited by 17
  25. 2021UniDrop: A Simple yet Effective Technique to Improve Transformer without Extra Costcited by 10
  26. 2020Multi-branch Attentive Transformercited by 9
  27. 2020All Word Embeddings from One Embeddingcited by 8
  28. 2020Token Drop mechanism for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  29. 2019Interrogating the Explanatory Power of Attention in Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
  30. 2019Data Diversification: A Simple Strategy For Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
  31. 2020Improving Target-side Lexical Transfer in Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
  32. 2021AUGVIC: Exploiting BiText Vicinity for Low-Resource NMTcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

9 papers.