mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaking the Representation Bottleneck of Chinese Characters: Neural Machine Translation with Stroke Sequence Modeling

arXiv 2211.12781 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing research generally treats Chinese character as a minimum unit for representation. However, such Chinese character representation will suffer two bottlenecks: 1) Learning bottleneck, the learning cannot benefit from its rich internal features (e.g., radicals and strokes); and 2) Parameter bottleneck, each individual character has to be represented by a unique vector. In this paper, we introduce a novel representation method for Chinese characters to break the bottlenecks, namely StrokeNet, which represents a Chinese character by a Latinized stroke sequence (e.g., "ao1 (concave)" to "ajaie" and "tu1 (convex)" to "aeaqe"). Specifically, StrokeNet maps each stroke to a specific Latin character, thus allowing similar Chinese characters to have similar Latin representations. With the introduction of StrokeNet to neural machine translation (NMT), many powerful but not applicable techniques to non-Latin languages (e.g., shared subword vocabulary learning and ciphertext-based data augmentation) can now be perfectly implemented. Experiments on the widely-used NIST Chinese-English, WMT17 Chinese-English and IWSLT17 Japanese-English NMT tasks show that StrokeNet can provide a significant performance boost over the strong baselines with fewer model parameters, achieving 26.5 BLEU on the WMT17 Chinese-English task which is better than any previously reported results without using monolingual data. Code and scripts are freely available at https://github.com/zjwang21/StrokeNet.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

37 of 48 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  4. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  7. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  8. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  9. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  10. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
  11. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
  12. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
25 more
  1. 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
  2. 2019BPE-Dropout: Simple and Effective Subword Regularizationcited by 189
  3. 2021Charformer: Fast Character Transformers via Gradient-based Subword Tokenizationcited by 158
  4. 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation with Doubly Adversarial Inputscited by 105
  5. 2020AdvAug: Robust Adversarial Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 66
  6. 2021ChineseBERT: Chinese Pretraining Enhanced by Glyph and Pinyin Informationcited by 65
  7. 2020Norm-Based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
  8. 2021Multi-view Subword Regularizationcited by 40
  9. 2021How BPE Affects Memorization in Transformerscited by 29
  10. 2020Understanding and Improving Encoder Layer Fusion in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 26
  11. 2021Subword Pooling Makes a Differencecited by 18
  12. 2021On the Copying Behaviors of Pre-Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
  13. 2017Glyph-aware Embedding of Chinese Characterscited by 14
  14. 2021On the Complementarity between Pre-Training and Back-Translation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
  15. 2021Chinese Character Decomposition for Neural MT with Multi-Word Expressionscited by 11
  16. 2018State-of-the-art Chinese Word Segmentation with Bi-LSTMscited by 10
  17. 2019Shared-Private Bilingual Word Embeddings for Neural Machine Translationcited by 9
  18. 2022CipherDAug: Ciphertext based Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 9
  19. 2015Component-Enhanced Chinese Character Embeddingscited by 8
  20. 2019Hierarchical Character Embeddings: Learning Phonological and Semantic Representations in Languages of Logographic Origin using Recursive Neural Networkscited by 8
  21. 2018Beyond Weight Tying: Learning Joint Input-Output Embeddings for Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
  22. 2018Neural Machine Translation of Logographic Languages Using Sub-character Level Informationcited by 4
  23. 2019Investigating Self-Attention Network for Chinese Word Segmentationcited by 2
  24. 2019Chinese-Japanese Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Using Sub-character Level Informationcited by 1
  25. 2020Inference-only sub-character decomposition improves translation of unseen logographic characterscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

6 papers.