mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transfer of Representations to Video Label Propagation: Implementation Factors Matter

arXiv 2203.05553 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work studies feature representations for dense label propagation in video, with a focus on recently proposed methods that learn video correspondence using self-supervised signals such as colorization or temporal cycle consistency. In the literature, these methods have been evaluated with an array of inconsistent settings, making it difficult to discern trends or compare performance fairly. Starting with a unified formulation of the label propagation algorithm that encompasses most existing variations, we systematically study the impact of important implementation factors in feature extraction and label propagation. Along the way, we report the accuracies of properly tuned supervised and unsupervised still image baselines, which are higher than those found in previous works. We also demonstrate that augmenting video-based correspondence cues with still-image-based ones can further improve performance. We then attempt a fair comparison of recent video-based methods on the DAVIS benchmark, showing convergence of best methods to performance levels near our strong ImageNet baseline, despite the usage of a variety of specialized video-based losses and training particulars. Additional comparisons on JHMDB and VIP datasets confirm the similar performance of current methods. We hope that this study will help to improve evaluation practices and better inform future research directions in temporal correspondence.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2022.

Builds on

33 of 39 references.

References · 33

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  6. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  7. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
  8. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 957
  9. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  10. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  11. 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
  12. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
21 more
  1. 2019Learning Correspondence from the Cycle-Consistency of Timecited by 269
  2. 2019Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 251
  3. 2020Space-Time Correspondence as a Contrastive Random Walkcited by 239
  4. 2016One-Shot Video Object Segmentationcited by 235
  5. 2021Associating Objects with Transformers for Video Object Segmentationcited by 226
  6. 2018Tracking Emerges by Colorizing Videoscited by 166
  7. 2019Boosting Few-Shot Visual Learning with Self-Supervisioncited by 140
  8. 2017Online Adaptation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Video Object Segmentationcited by 109
  9. 2020MAST: A Memory-Augmented Self-supervised Trackercited by 109
  10. 2018Self-Supervised GANs via Auxiliary Rotation Losscited by 94
  11. 2018PReMVOS: Proposal-generation, Refinement and Merging for Video Object Segmentationcited by 81
  12. 2021Rethinking Self-supervised Correspondence Learning: A Video Frame-level Similarity Perspectivecited by 81
  13. 2019Joint-task Self-supervised Learning for Temporal Correspondencecited by 80
  14. 2021Do Different Tracking Tasks Require Different Appearance Models?cited by 62
  15. 2018CNN in MRF: Video Object Segmentation via Inference in A CNN-Based Higher-Order Spatio-Temporal MRFcited by 48
  16. 2017Thin-Slicing Network: A Deep Structured Model for Pose Estimation in Videoscited by 40
  17. 2018Adaptive Temporal Encoding Network for Video Instance-level Human Parsingcited by 36
  18. 2014Do Convnets Learn Correspondence?cited by 28
  19. 2021Dense Unsupervised Learning for Video Segmentationcited by 26
  20. 2019Self-supervised Learning for Video Correspondence Flowcited by 21
  21. 2017Holistic, Instance-Level Human Parsingcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.