mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attribute Descent: Simulating Object-Centric Datasets on the Content Level and Beyond

arXiv 2202.14034 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2022cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article aims to use graphic engines to simulate a large number of training data that have free annotations and possibly strongly resemble to real-world data. Between synthetic and real, a two-level domain gap exists, involving content level and appearance level. While the latter is concerned with appearance style, the former problem arises from a different mechanism, i.e, content mismatch in attributes such as camera viewpoint, object placement and lighting conditions. In contrast to the widely-studied appearance-level gap, the content-level discrepancy has not been broadly studied. To address the content-level misalignment, we propose an attribute descent approach that automatically optimizes engine attributes to enable synthetic data to approximate real-world data. We verify our method on object-centric tasks, wherein an object takes up a major portion of an image. In these tasks, the search space is relatively small, and the optimization of each attribute yields sufficiently obvious supervision signals. We collect a new synthetic asset VehicleX, and reformat and reuse existing the synthetic assets ObjectX and PersonX. Extensive experiments on image classification and object re-identification confirm that adapted synthetic data can be effectively used in three scenarios: training with synthetic data only, training data augmentation and numerically understanding dataset content.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2022.

Builds on

62 of 91 references.

References · 62

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  6. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  7. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  8. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  9. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  10. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  11. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  12. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
38 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  2. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  3. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  4. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  5. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
  6. 2016Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Trackingcited by 685
  7. 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
  8. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  9. 2017Beyond Part Models: Person Retrieval with Refined Part Pooling (and a Strong Convolutional Baseline)cited by 472
  10. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 432
  11. 2021TransReID: Transformer-based Object Re-Identificationcited by 432
  12. 2019Bag of Tricks and A Strong Baseline for Deep Person Re-identificationcited by 429
  13. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
  14. 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 389
  15. 2016Virtual Worlds as Proxy for Multi-Object Tracking Analysiscited by 340
  16. 2019Bidirectional Learning for Domain Adaptation of Semantic Segmentationcited by 308
  17. 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 292
  18. 2016Learning from Simulated and Unsupervised Images through Adversarial Trainingcited by 287
  19. 2017Learning to Discover Cross-Domain Relations with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
  20. 2018Unity: A General Platform for Intelligent Agentscited by 232
  21. 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 218
  22. 2020RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platformcited by 190
  23. 2017Image-Image Domain Adaptation with Preserved Self-Similarity and Domain-Dissimilarity for Person Re-identificationcited by 168
  24. 2019Learning from Synthetic Data for Crowd Counting in the Wildcited by 148
  25. 2019Meta-Sim: Learning to Generate Synthetic Datasetscited by 128
  26. 2019Generating 3D People in Scenes without Peoplecited by 127
  27. 2017Genetic CNNcited by 124
  28. 2019CityFlow: A City-Scale Benchmark for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking and Re-Identificationcited by 119
  29. 2020CrDoCo: Pixel-level Domain Transfer with Cross-Domain Consistencycited by 107
  30. 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
  31. 2021Neural Parts: Learning Expressive 3D Shape Abstractions with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 101
  32. 2018Dissecting Person Re-identification from the Viewpoint of Viewpointcited by 83
  33. 2020Joint Disentangling and Adaptation for Cross-Domain Person Re-Identificationcited by 83
  34. 2020Multiview Detection with Feature Perspective Transformationcited by 70
  35. 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
  36. 2020Meta-Sim2: Unsupervised Learning of Scene Structure for Synthetic Data Generationcited by 58
  37. 20213DStyleNet: Creating 3D Shapes with Geometric and Texture Style Variationscited by 58
  38. 2019Vehicle Re-identification with Viewpoint-aware Metric Learningcited by 45

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

9 papers.