Statistics and Deep Learning-based Hybrid Model for Interpretable Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hybrid methods have been shown to outperform pure statistical and pure deep learning methods at both forecasting tasks, and at quantifying the uncertainty associated with those forecasts (prediction intervals). One example is Multivariate Exponential Smoothing Long Short-Term Memory (MES-LSTM), a hybrid between a multivariate statistical forecasting model and a Recurrent Neural Network variant, Long Short-Term Memory. It has also been shown that a model that (i) produces accurate forecasts and (ii) is able to quantify the associated predictive uncertainty satisfactorily, can be successfully adapted to a model suitable for anomaly detection tasks. With the increasing ubiquity of multivariate data and new application domains, there have been numerous anomaly detection methods proposed in recent years. The proposed methods have largely focused on deep learning techniques, which are prone to suffer from challenges such as (i) large sets of parameters that may be computationally intensive to tune, (ii) returning too many false positives rendering the techniques impractical for use, (iii) requiring labeled datasets for training which are often not prevalent in real life, and (iv) understanding of the root causes of anomaly occurrences inhibited by the predominantly black-box nature of deep learning methods. In this article, an extension of MES-LSTM is presented, an interpretable anomaly detection model that overcomes these challenges. With a focus on renewable energy generation as an application domain, the proposed approach is benchmarked against the state-of-the-art. The findings are that MES-LSTM anomaly detector is at least competitive to the benchmarks at anomaly detection tasks, and less prone to learning from spurious effects than the benchmarks, thus making it more reliable at root cause discovery and explanation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.
Builds on
42 of 76 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
30 more
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
- 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 360
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
- 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 339
- 2018The UEA multivariate time series classification archive, 2018cited by 338
- 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
- 2020MINIROCKET: A Very Fast (Almost) Deterministic Transform for Time Series Classificationcited by 190
- 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 166
- 2020Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Classification Algorithmscited by 145
- 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 127
- 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
- 2013A Time Series Forest for Classification and Feature Extractioncited by 69
- 2021Explainable Deep Few-shot Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 69
- 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
- 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
- 2018An overview of deep learning based methods for unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection in videoscited by 45
- 2019GEE: A Gradient-based Explainable Variational Autoencoder for Network Anomaly Detectioncited by 36
- 2018TSViz: Demystification of Deep Learning Models for Time-Series Analysiscited by 25
- 2020Causality-based Explanation of Classification Outcomescited by 25
- 2019Scalable Dictionary Classifiers for Time Series Classificationcited by 20
- 2021The World as a Graph: Improving El Ni~no Forecasts with Graph Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2013Improvements to deep convolutional neural networks for LVCSRcited by 11
- 2019Rule Extraction in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Model Explainability: Application to OneClass SVMcited by 8
- 2021Multivariate Anomaly Detection based on Prediction Intervals Constructed using Deep Learningcited by 7
- 2019ExplainIt! -- A declarative root-cause analysis engine for time series data (extended version)cited by 6
- 2021A Statistics and Deep Learning Hybrid Method for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting and Mortality Modelingcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.