mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perception

arXiv 2202.07825 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In state-of-the-art deep learning for object recognition, SoftMax and Sigmoid functions are most commonly employed as the predictor outputs. Such layers often produce overconfident predictions rather than proper probabilistic scores, which can thus harm the decision-making of `critical' perception systems applied in autonomous driving and robotics. Given this, the experiments in this work propose a probabilistic approach based on distributions calculated out of the Logit layer scores of pre-trained networks. We demonstrate that Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum a-Posteriori (MAP) functions are more suitable for probabilistic interpretations than SoftMax and Sigmoid-based predictions for object recognition. We explore distinct sensor modalities via RGB images and LiDARs (RV: range-view) data from the KITTI and Lyft Level-5 datasets, where our approach shows promising performance compared to the usual SoftMax and Sigmoid layers, with the benefit of enabling interpretable probabilistic predictions. Another advantage of the approach introduced in this paper is that the ML and MAP functions can be implemented in existing trained networks, that is, the approach benefits from the output of the Logit layer of pre-trained networks. Thus, there is no need to carry out a new training phase since the ML and MAP functions are used in the test/prediction phase.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2022.

Builds on

42 of 96 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  6. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  8. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  9. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
  10. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  11. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  12. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
30 more
  1. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  2. 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 419
  3. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
  4. 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 314
  5. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
  6. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  7. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  8. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  9. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  10. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  11. 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
  12. 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
  13. 2018Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: Capture Uncertainty in the Deep Neural Network For Lidar 3D Vehicle Detectioncited by 82
  14. 2019The H3D Dataset for Full-Surround 3D Multi-Object Detection and Tracking in Crowded Urban Scenescited by 80
  15. 2020Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibrationcited by 79
  16. 2019A*3D Dataset: Towards Autonomous Driving in Challenging Environmentscited by 65
  17. 2018ApolloCar3D: A Large 3D Car Instance Understanding Benchmark for Autonomous Drivingcited by 59
  18. 2019A Comprehensive guide to Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network with Variational Inferencecited by 51
  19. 2021Top-label calibration and multiclass-to-binary reductionscited by 46
  20. 2019Segmenting Objects in Day and Night:Edge-Conditioned CNN for Thermal Image Semantic Segmentationcited by 36
  21. 2018Leveraging Heteroscedastic Aleatoric Uncertainties for Robust Real-Time LiDAR 3D Object Detectioncited by 19
  22. 2014Binary Classifier Calibration: Non-parametric approachcited by 13
  23. 2020VTGNet: A Vision-based Trajectory Generation Network for Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Environmentscited by 13
  24. 2020Inferring Spatial Uncertainty in Object Detectioncited by 10
  25. 2020Efficient Computation Reduction in Bayesian Neural Networks Through Feature Decomposition and Memorizationcited by 10
  26. 2020Towards Better Performance and More Explainable Uncertainty for 3D Object Detection of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 9
  27. 2016High-resolution LIDAR-based Depth Mapping using Bilateral Filtercited by 7
  28. 2019Correlated Parameters to Accurately Measure Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
  29. 2020Probabilistic Object Classification using CNN ML-MAP layerscited by 3
  30. 2021Probabilistic Approach for Road-Users Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

7 papers.