Probabilistic Approach for Road-Users Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Object detection in autonomous driving applications implies that the detection and tracking of semantic objects are commonly native to urban driving environments, as pedestrians and vehicles. One of the major challenges in state-of-the-art deep-learning based object detection are false positives which occur with overconfident scores. This is highly undesirable in autonomous driving and other critical robotic-perception domains because of safety concerns. This paper proposes an approach to alleviate the problem of overconfident predictions by introducing a novel probabilistic layer to deep object detection networks in testing. The suggested approach avoids the traditional Sigmoid or Softmax prediction layer which often produces overconfident predictions. It is demonstrated that the proposed technique reduces overconfidence in the false positives without degrading the performance on the true positives. The approach is validated on the 2D-KITTI objection detection through the YOLOV4 and SECOND (Lidar-based detector). The proposed approach enables interpretable probabilistic predictions without the requirement of re-training the network and therefore is very practical.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2021.
Builds on
45 of 77 references.
References · 45
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
33 more
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2021KITTI-360: A Novel Dataset and Benchmarks for Urban Scene Understanding in 2D and 3Dcited by 570
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
- 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 418
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 183
- 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
- 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
- 2018Flipout: Efficient Pseudo-Independent Weight Perturbations on Mini-Batchescited by 133
- 2020Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationcited by 123
- 2020A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 115
- 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
- 2018Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: Capture Uncertainty in the Deep Neural Network For Lidar 3D Vehicle Detectioncited by 82
- 2021ROAD: The ROad event Awareness Dataset for Autonomous Drivingcited by 54
- 2021Energy-Based Open-World Uncertainty Modeling for Confidence Calibrationcited by 46
- 2020Regularization via Structural Label Smoothingcited by 29
- 2020Cross-Iteration Batch Normalizationcited by 20
- 2018Leveraging Heteroscedastic Aleatoric Uncertainties for Robust Real-Time LiDAR 3D Object Detectioncited by 19
- 2020Labels Are Not Perfect: Inferring Spatial Uncertainty in Object Detectioncited by 17
- 2019Correlated Parameters to Accurately Measure Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020Stereo RGB and Deeper LIDAR Based Network for 3D Object Detectioncited by 4
- 2020Probabilistic Object Classification using CNN ML-MAP layerscited by 3
- 2020Labels Are Not Perfect: Improving Probabilistic Object Detection via Label Uncertaintycited by 3
- 2019LS-SVR as a Bayesian RBF networkcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.