mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Uncertainty Quantification via Collisions

arXiv 2411.12127 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new and intuitive metric for aleatoric uncertainty quantification (UQ), the prevalence of class collisions defined as the same input being observed in different classes. We use the rate of class collisions to define the collision matrix, a novel and uniquely fine-grained measure of uncertainty. For a classification problem involving K classes, the K× K collision matrix S measures the inherent difficulty in distinguishing between each pair of classes. We discuss several applications of the collision matrix, establish its fundamental mathematical properties, and show its relationship with existing UQ methods, including the Bayes error rate (BER). We also address the new problem of estimating the collision matrix using one-hot labeled data by proposing a series of innovative techniques to estimate S. First, we learn a pair-wise contrastive model which accepts two inputs and determines if they belong to the same class. We then show that this contrastive model (which is PAC learnable) can be used to estimate the row Gramian matrix of S, defined as G=SST. Finally, we show that under reasonable assumptions, G can be used to uniquely recover S, a new result on non-negative matrices which could be of independent interest. With a method to estimate S established, we demonstrate how this estimate of S, in conjunction with the contrastive model, can be used to estimate the posterior class probability distribution of any point. Experimental results are also presented to validate our methods of estimating the collision matrix and class posterior distributions on several datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  4. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  5. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  6. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
  7. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  8. 2022A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglementcited by 87
  9. 2021Is MC Dropout Bayesian?cited by 35
  10. 2024Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 22
  11. 2013Adaptive Metric Dimensionality Reductioncited by 14
  12. 2019A Bayesian Deep Learning Framework for End-To-End Prediction of Emotion from Heartbeatcited by 11
2 more
  1. 2022Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perceptioncited by 7
  2. 2024Trustworthy Actionable Perturbationscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.