Inherent Diverse Redundant Safety Mechanisms for AI-based Software Elements in Automotive Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper explores the role and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, specifically AI-based software elements, in autonomous driving systems. These AI systems are fundamental in executing real-time critical functions in complex and high-dimensional environments. They handle vital tasks like multi-modal perception, cognition, and decision-making tasks such as motion planning, lane keeping, and emergency braking. A primary concern relates to the ability (and necessity) of AI models to generalize beyond their initial training data. This generalization issue becomes evident in real-time scenarios, where models frequently encounter inputs not represented in their training or validation data. In such cases, AI systems must still function effectively despite facing distributional or domain shifts. This paper investigates the risk associated with overconfident AI models in safety-critical applications like autonomous driving. To mitigate these risks, methods for training AI models that help maintain performance without overconfidence are proposed. This involves implementing certainty reporting architectures and ensuring diverse training data. While various distribution-based methods exist to provide safety mechanisms for AI models, there is a noted lack of systematic assessment of these methods, especially in the context of safety-critical automotive applications. Many methods in the literature do not adapt well to the quick response times required in safety-critical edge applications. This paper reviews these methods, discusses their suitability for safety-critical applications, and highlights their strengths and limitations. The paper also proposes potential improvements to enhance the safety and reliability of AI algorithms in autonomous vehicles in the context of rapid and accurate decision-making processes.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2024.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2017On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Modelscited by 103
10 more
- 2017Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Collision Avoidancecited by 86
- 2019Adversarial Defense by Restricting the Hidden Space of Deep Neural Networkscited by 56
- 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
- 2021Evading Adversarial Example Detection Defenses with Orthogonal Projected Gradient Descentcited by 34
- 2021Feature Shift Detection: Localizing Which Features Have Shifted via Conditional Distribution Testscited by 24
- 2022Out-Of-Distribution Detection Is Not All You Needcited by 23
- 2019Practical Solutions for Machine Learning Safety in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 15
- 2022Detecting Adversarial Perturbations in Multi-Task Perceptioncited by 15
- 2021Benchmarking Safety Monitors for Image Classifiers with Machine Learningcited by 14
- 2022Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perceptioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025An Entropic Metric for Measuring Calibration of Machine Learning Modelscited by 2
- 2025HySafe-AI: Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems: A Case Studycited by 0
- 2025Dataset Safety in Autonomous Driving: Requirements, Risks, and Assurancecited by 0
- 2026Reciprocal Trust and Distrust in Artificial Intelligence Systems: The Hard Problem of Regulationcited by 0
- 2026Reciprocal Trust and Distrust in Artificial Intelligence Systems: The Hard Problem of Regulation7 Apr 2026
- 2025Dataset Safety in Autonomous Driving: Requirements, Risks, and Assurance11 Nov 2025
- 2025HySafe-AI: Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems: A Case Study23 Jul 2025
- 2025An Entropic Metric for Measuring Calibration of Machine Learning Models20 Feb 2025