mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Textured Mesh Quality Assessment: Large-Scale Dataset and Deep Learning-based Quality Metric

arXiv 2202.02397 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2022cs.GRcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past decade, 3D graphics have become highly detailed to mimic the real world, exploding their size and complexity. Certain applications and device constraints necessitate their simplification and/or lossy compression, which can degrade their visual quality. Thus, to ensure the best Quality of Experience (QoE), it is important to evaluate the visual quality to accurately drive the compression and find the right compromise between visual quality and data size. In this work, we focus on subjective and objective quality assessment of textured 3D meshes. We first establish a large-scale dataset, which includes 55 source models quantitatively characterized in terms of geometric, color, and semantic complexity, and corrupted by combinations of 5 types of compression-based distortions applied on the geometry, texture mapping and texture image of the meshes. This dataset contains over 343k distorted stimuli. We propose an approach to select a challenging subset of 3000 stimuli for which we collected 148929 quality judgments from over 4500 participants in a large-scale crowdsourced subjective experiment. Leveraging our subject-rated dataset, a learning-based quality metric for 3D graphics was proposed. Our metric demonstrates state-of-the-art results on our dataset of textured meshes and on a dataset of distorted meshes with vertex colors. Finally, we present an application of our metric and dataset to explore the influence of distortion interactions and content characteristics on the perceived quality of compressed textured meshes.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 10; 2024: 4; 2025: 10.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Advancing Zero-Shot Digital Human Quality Assessment through Text-Prompted Evaluationcited by 27
  2. 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
  3. 2023GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 20
  4. 2025Objaverse++: Curated 3D Object Dataset with Quality Annotationscited by 20
  5. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Human Headscited by 13
  6. 2023TSMD: A Database for Static Color Mesh Quality Assessment Studycited by 11
  7. 2023SJTU-TMQA: A quality assessment database for static mesh with texture mapcited by 10
  8. 2022DDH-QA: A Dynamic Digital Humans Quality Assessment Databasecited by 9
  9. 2023EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  10. 2023A No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Digital Human Headcited by 6
  11. 2023TDMD: A Database for Dynamic Color Mesh Subjective and Objective Quality Explorationscited by 5
  12. 2023GeodesicPSIM: Predicting the Quality of Static Mesh with Texture Map via Geodesic Patch Similaritycited by 4
14 more
  1. 2025MUGSQA: Novel Multi-Uncertainty-Based Gaussian Splatting Quality Assessment Method, Dataset, and Benchmarkscited by 4
  2. 2023Screen-based 3D Subjective Experiment Softwarecited by 3
  3. 2023GeoScaler: Geometry and Rendering-Aware Downsampling of 3D Mesh Texturescited by 3
  4. 2025DHQA-4D: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic 4D Digital Humancited by 3
  5. 2024Perceptual Crack Detection for Rendered 3D Textured Meshescited by 2
  6. 2024HybridMQA: Exploring Geometry-Texture Interactions for Colored Mesh Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  7. 2025Mesh Mamba: A Unified State Space Model for Saliency Prediction in Non-Textured and Textured Meshescited by 2
  8. 2025DM-OSVP++: One-Shot View Planning Using 3D Diffusion Models for Active RGB-Based Object Reconstructioncited by 2
  9. 2025Quality assessment of 3D human animation: Subjective and objective evaluationcited by 1
  10. 2025Exploring Instruction Data Quality for Explainable Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  11. 20243D2M Dataset: A 3-Dimension diverse Mesh Datasetcited by 0
  12. 2025Textured mesh Quality Assessment using Geometry and Color Field Similaritycited by 0
  13. 2025SRAM: Shape-Realism Alignment Metric for No Reference 3D Shape Evaluationcited by 0
  14. 2025Textured Geometry Evaluation: Perceptual 3D Textured Shape Metric via 3D Latent-Geometry Networkcited by 0