mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessment

arXiv 2302.08715 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2023cs.CV eess.IVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, great numbers of efforts have been put into improving the effectiveness of 3D model quality assessment (3DQA) methods. However, little attention has been paid to the computational costs and inference time, which is also important for practical applications. Unlike 2D media, 3D models are represented by more complicated and irregular digital formats, such as point cloud and mesh. Thus it is normally difficult to perform an efficient module to extract quality-aware features of 3D models. In this paper, we address this problem from the aspect of projection-based 3DQA and develop a no-reference (NR) underlineEfficient and underlineEffective underlineProjection-based underline3D Model underlineQuality underlineAssessment (EEP-3DQA) method. The input projection images of EEP-3DQA are randomly sampled from the six perpendicular viewpoints of the 3D model and are further spatially downsampled by the grid-mini patch sampling strategy. Further, the lightweight Swin-Transformer tiny is utilized as the backbone to extract the quality-aware features. Finally, the proposed EEP-3DQA and EEP-3DQA-t (tiny version) achieve the best performance than the existing state-of-the-art NR-3DQA methods and even outperforms most full-reference (FR) 3DQA methods on the point cloud and mesh quality assessment databases while consuming less inference time than the compared 3DQA methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2023.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  4. 2020Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similaritycited by 57
  5. 2020Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metriccited by 51
  6. 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Modelscited by 49
  7. 2021Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Cloudscited by 49
  8. 2022MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 38
  9. 2022Textured Mesh Quality Assessment: Large-Scale Dataset and Deep Learning-based Quality Metriccited by 26
  10. 2022A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequencescited by 24
  11. 2022Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metriccited by 22
  12. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Human Headscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4.

8 papers.