mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimal Sample Complexity of Stable Discounted Markov Decision Processes

arXiv 2302.07477 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2023cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the optimal sample complexity of tabular reinforcement learning for infinite-horizon discounted Markov decision processes. The unrestricted minimax sample complexity is known to scale as widetildeTheta((1-γ)-3ε-2), where γ denotes the discount factor and ε is the solution-error tolerance. However, this worst-case rate does not account for stability structures that commonly arise in operational environments. Using the variance-reduced Q-learning framework, we show that, without imposing any additional stability assumptions, both sup-norm Q-function estimation and policy learning have leading sample-complexity dependence widetildeTheta(H(1-γ)-2ε-2), where H=|v^*|span is the span of the optimal value function. Moreover, assuming a uniform mixing time upper bound tmix over all policies, the optimal Q-function can be estimated up to a constant shift with sample complexity widetildeThetaleft(tmix3ε-2right), independent of (1-γ)-1. Matching lower bounds establish the sharpness of these leading dependencies and reveal a separation between estimation and control: although the Q-function can be learned up to an additive constant at a horizon-free rate, policy learning generally retains its (1-γ)-2 dependence.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2023.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016CAD2RL: Real Single-Image Flight without a Single Real Imagecited by 233
  2. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 127
  3. 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 105
  4. 2022Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  5. 2019Model-free Reinforcement Learning in Infinite-horizon Average-reward Markov Decision Processescited by 82
  6. 2020Instance-Dependent Complexity of Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: A Disagreement-Based Perspectivecited by 78
  7. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 77
  8. 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 73
  9. 2018Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  10. 2020Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysiscited by 41
  11. 2021Beyond No Regret: Instance-Dependent PAC Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  12. 2017Primal-Dual π Learning: Sample Complexity and Sublinear Run Time for Ergodic Markov Decision Problemscited by 33
5 more
  1. 2021Towards Tight Bounds on the Sample Complexity of Average-reward MDPscited by 33
  2. 2021A Statistical Analysis of Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Q-learningcited by 29
  3. 2022Near Sample-Optimal Reduction-based Policy Learning for Average Reward MDPcited by 29
  4. 2020Q-learning with Uniformly Bounded Variance: Large Discounting is Not a Barrier to Fast Learningcited by 13
  5. 2022Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.