Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Q-learning algorithm is a simple and widely-used stochastic approximation scheme for reinforcement learning, but the basic protocol can exhibit instability in conjunction with function approximation. Such instability can be observed even with linear function approximation. In practice, tools such as target networks and experience replay appear to be essential, but the individual contribution of each of these mechanisms is not well understood theoretically. This work proposes an exploration variant of the basic Q-learning protocol with linear function approximation. Our modular analysis illustrates the role played by each algorithmic tool that we adopt: a second order update rule, a set of target networks, and a mechanism akin to experience replay. Together, they enable state of the art regret bounds on linear MDPs while preserving the most prominent feature of the algorithm, namely a space complexity independent of the number of step elapsed. We show that the performance of the algorithm degrades very gracefully under a novel and more permissive notion of approximation error. The algorithm also exhibits a form of instance-dependence, in that its performance depends on the "effective" feature dimension.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.
Builds on
56 of 91 references.
References · 56
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 292
- 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 269
- 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
- 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 233
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
- 2021Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 223
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 201
- 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 195
38 more
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 181
- 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 178
- 2020What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?cited by 136
- 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
- 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
- 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
- 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 105
- 2019Frequentist Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iterationcited by 101
- 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
- 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 92
- 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 92
- 2021Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 91
- 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 85
- 2021Model-free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-rank MDPscited by 82
- 2020Logarithmic Regret for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 79
- 2021Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimismcited by 78
- 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 77
- 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 73
- 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Planning in MDPs With Linearly-Realizable Optimal Action-Value Functionscited by 71
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximationcited by 71
- 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
- 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Batch Reinforcement Learning: Batch RL can be Exponentially Harder than Online RLcited by 55
- 2021Cautiously Optimistic Policy Optimization and Exploration with Linear Function Approximationcited by 53
- 2021Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Bounds for Tabular MDPs via Adaptive Multi-Step Bootstrapcited by 49
- 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 42
- 2021Beyond No Regret: Instance-Dependent PAC Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
- 2021An Exponential Lower Bound for Linearly-Realizable MDPs with Constant Suboptimality Gapcited by 40
- 2021First-Order Regret in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: A Robust Estimation Approachcited by 38
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation: Provably Efficient Approach via Bounded Eluder Dimensioncited by 37
- 2020Finite-Sample Analysis of Proximal Gradient TD Algorithmscited by 32
- 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 22
- 2014Competing with the Empirical Risk Minimizer in a Single Passcited by 20
- 2020Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processescited by 20
- 2021Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPscited by 19
- 2022Optimal variance-reduced stochastic approximation in Banach spacescited by 17
- 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
- 2021TensorPlan and the Few Actions Lower Bound for Planning in MDPs under Linear Realizability of Optimal Value Functionscited by 7
50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humanscited by 36
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagency: Provably Efficient Decentralized Multi-Agent RL with Function Approximationcited by 30
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagents in a Large State Space: RL in Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximationcited by 27
- 2022Understanding Deep Neural Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning via ε-Greedy Explorationcited by 11
- 2024Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximationcited by 3
- 2024Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation11 Feb 2024
- 2023Position: AI Evaluation Should Learn from How We Test Humans18 Jun 2023
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagency: Provably Efficient Decentralized Multi-Agent RL with Function Approximation13 Feb 2023
- 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagents in a Large State Space: RL in Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation7 Feb 2023
- 2022Understanding Deep Neural Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning via ε-Greedy Exploration15 Sep 2022