mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning

arXiv 2206.00796 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Q-learning algorithm is a simple and widely-used stochastic approximation scheme for reinforcement learning, but the basic protocol can exhibit instability in conjunction with function approximation. Such instability can be observed even with linear function approximation. In practice, tools such as target networks and experience replay appear to be essential, but the individual contribution of each of these mechanisms is not well understood theoretically. This work proposes an exploration variant of the basic Q-learning protocol with linear function approximation. Our modular analysis illustrates the role played by each algorithmic tool that we adopt: a second order update rule, a set of target networks, and a mechanism akin to experience replay. Together, they enable state of the art regret bounds on linear MDPs while preserving the most prominent feature of the algorithm, namely a space complexity independent of the number of step elapsed. We show that the performance of the algorithm degrades very gracefully under a novel and more permissive notion of approximation error. The algorithm also exhibits a form of instance-dependence, in that its performance depends on the "effective" feature dimension.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

Builds on

56 of 91 references.

References · 56

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  2. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  3. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  4. 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 292
  5. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 269
  6. 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
  7. 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 233
  8. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
  9. 2021Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 223
  10. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
  11. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 201
  12. 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 195
38 more
  1. 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 181
  2. 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 178
  3. 2020What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?cited by 136
  4. 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
  5. 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
  6. 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
  7. 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
  8. 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 105
  9. 2019Frequentist Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iterationcited by 101
  10. 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
  11. 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 92
  12. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 92
  13. 2021Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 91
  14. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 85
  15. 2021Model-free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-rank MDPscited by 82
  16. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 79
  17. 2021Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimismcited by 78
  18. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 77
  19. 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 73
  20. 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Planning in MDPs With Linearly-Realizable Optimal Action-Value Functionscited by 71
  21. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximationcited by 71
  22. 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
  23. 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Batch Reinforcement Learning: Batch RL can be Exponentially Harder than Online RLcited by 55
  24. 2021Cautiously Optimistic Policy Optimization and Exploration with Linear Function Approximationcited by 53
  25. 2021Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Bounds for Tabular MDPs via Adaptive Multi-Step Bootstrapcited by 49
  26. 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 42
  27. 2021Beyond No Regret: Instance-Dependent PAC Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  28. 2021An Exponential Lower Bound for Linearly-Realizable MDPs with Constant Suboptimality Gapcited by 40
  29. 2021First-Order Regret in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: A Robust Estimation Approachcited by 38
  30. 2020Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation: Provably Efficient Approach via Bounded Eluder Dimensioncited by 37
  31. 2020Finite-Sample Analysis of Proximal Gradient TD Algorithmscited by 32
  32. 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 22
  33. 2014Competing with the Empirical Risk Minimizer in a Single Passcited by 20
  34. 2020Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processescited by 20
  35. 2021Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPscited by 19
  36. 2022Optimal variance-reduced stochastic approximation in Banach spacescited by 17
  37. 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
  38. 2021TensorPlan and the Few Actions Lower Bound for Planning in MDPs under Linear Realizability of Optimal Value Functionscited by 7

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

5 papers.