Transcribing Natural Languages for The Deaf via Neural Editing Programs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work studies the task of glossification, of which the aim is to em transcribe natural spoken language sentences for the Deaf (hard-of-hearing) community to ordered sign language glosses. Previous sequence-to-sequence language models trained with paired sentence-gloss data often fail to capture the rich connections between the two distinct languages, leading to unsatisfactory transcriptions. We observe that despite different grammars, glosses effectively simplify sentences for the ease of deaf communication, while sharing a large portion of vocabulary with sentences. This has motivated us to implement glossification by executing a collection of editing actions, e.g. word addition, deletion, and copying, called editing programs, on their natural spoken language counterparts. Specifically, we design a new neural agent that learns to synthesize and execute editing programs, conditioned on sentence contexts and partial editing results. The agent is trained to imitate minimal editing programs, while exploring more widely the program space via policy gradients to optimize sequence-wise transcription quality. Results show that our approach outperforms previous glossification models by a large margin.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.
Builds on
27 of 42 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
- 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 217
- 2019Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparisoncited by 217
- 2021Improving Sign Language Translation with Monolingual Data by Sign Back-Translationcited by 177
- 2020Progressive Transformers for End-to-End Sign Language Productioncited by 119
- 2020BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cuescited by 106
15 more
- 2015Neural Programmer-Interpreterscited by 96
- 2018Leveraging Grammar and Reinforcement Learning for Neural Program Synthesiscited by 83
- 2021Visual Alignment Constraint for Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 79
- 2020TSPNet: Hierarchical Feature Learning via Temporal Semantic Pyramid for Sign Language Translationcited by 75
- 2017Learning to Infer Graphics Programs from Hand-Drawn Imagescited by 73
- 2019Learning to Infer and Execute 3D Shape Programscited by 68
- 2021Including Signed Languages in Natural Language Processingcited by 67
- 2019EditNTS: An Neural Programmer-Interpreter Model for Sentence Simplification through Explicit Editingcited by 63
- 2020Transferring Cross-domain Knowledge for Video Sign Language Recognitioncited by 60
- 2021Mixed SIGNals: Sign Language Production via a Mixture of Motion Primitivescited by 50
- 2015Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memorycited by 45
- 2020Synthesize, Execute and Debug: Learning to Repair for Neural Program Synthesiscited by 39
- 2019Program Synthesis and Semantic Parsing with Learned Code Idiomscited by 34
- 2020A Better Variant of Self-Critical Sequence Trainingcited by 23
- 2020Program Synthesis with Pragmatic Communicationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Automatic dense annotation of large-vocabulary sign language videoscited by 20
- 2022Changing the Representation: Examining Language Representation for Neural Sign Language Productioncited by 15
- 2024Self-Supervised Representation Learning with Spatial-Temporal Consistency for Sign Language Recognitioncited by 6
- 2024Select and Reorder: A Novel Approach for Neural Sign Language Productioncited by 3
- 2025Cross-Modal Consistency Learning for Sign Language Recognitioncited by 1
- 2024Semi-Supervised Spoken Language Glossificationcited by 0
- 2026LA-Sign: Looped Transformers with Geometry-aware Alignment for Skeleton-based Sign Language Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026LA-Sign: Looped Transformers with Geometry-aware Alignment for Skeleton-based Sign Language Recognition30 Mar 2026
- 2025Cross-Modal Consistency Learning for Sign Language Recognition16 Mar 2025
- 2024Self-Supervised Representation Learning with Spatial-Temporal Consistency for Sign Language Recognition15 Jun 2024
- 2024Semi-Supervised Spoken Language Glossification12 Jun 2024
- 2024Select and Reorder: A Novel Approach for Neural Sign Language Production17 Apr 2024
- 2022Changing the Representation: Examining Language Representation for Neural Sign Language Production16 Sep 2022
- 2022Automatic dense annotation of large-vocabulary sign language videos4 Aug 2022