mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Law Article Mining based on Deep Pre-Trained Language Representation Models with Application to the Italian Civil Code

arXiv 2112.03033 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling law search and retrieval as prediction problems has recently emerged as a predominant approach in law intelligence. Focusing on the law article retrieval task, we present a deep learning framework named LamBERTa, which is designed for civil-law codes, and specifically trained on the Italian civil code. To our knowledge, this is the first study proposing an advanced approach to law article prediction for the Italian legal system based on a BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) learning framework, which has recently attracted increased attention among deep learning approaches, showing outstanding effectiveness in several natural language processing and learning tasks. We define LamBERTa models by fine-tuning an Italian pre-trained BERT on the Italian civil code or its portions, for law article retrieval as a classification task. One key aspect of our LamBERTa framework is that we conceived it to address an extreme classification scenario, which is characterized by a high number of classes, the few-shot learning problem, and the lack of test query benchmarks for Italian legal prediction tasks. To solve such issues, we define different methods for the unsupervised labeling of the law articles, which can in principle be applied to any law article code system. We provide insights into the explainability and interpretability of our LamBERTa models, and we present an extensive experimental analysis over query sets of different type, for single-label as well as multi-label evaluation tasks. Empirical evidence has shown the effectiveness of LamBERTa, and also its superiority against widely used deep-learning text classifiers and a few-shot learner conceived for an attribute-aware prediction task.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2021.

Builds on

18 of 67 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  5. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  6. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  7. 2016Recurrent Neural Network for Text Classification with Multi-Task Learningcited by 144
  8. 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
  9. 2017Comparative Study of CNN and RNN for Natural Language Processingcited by 81
  10. 2017Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basiscited by 61
  11. 2019Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Networkcited by 50
  12. 2018Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptionscited by 36
6 more
  1. 2017Exploring the Use of Text Classification in the Legal Domaincited by 31
  2. 2019Extreme Multi-Label Legal Text Classification: A case study in EU Legislationcited by 26
  3. 2018Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehensioncited by 19
  4. 2018Obligation and Prohibition Extraction Using Hierarchical RNNscited by 18
  5. 2017Legal Question Answering using Ranking SVM and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 9
  6. 2021JNLP Team: Deep Learning Approaches for Legal Processing Tasks in COLIEE 2021cited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

6 papers.