mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Matching Learned Causal Effects of Neural Networks with Domain Priors

arXiv 2111.12490 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A trained neural network can be interpreted as a structural causal model (SCM) that provides the effect of changing input variables on the model's output. However, if training data contains both causal and correlational relationships, a model that optimizes prediction accuracy may not necessarily learn the true causal relationships between input and output variables. On the other hand, expert users often have prior knowledge of the causal relationship between certain input variables and output from domain knowledge. Therefore, we propose a regularization method that aligns the learned causal effects of a neural network with domain priors, including both direct and total causal effects. We show that this approach can generalize to different kinds of domain priors, including monotonicity of causal effect of an input variable on output or zero causal effect of a variable on output for purposes of fairness. Our experiments on twelve benchmark datasets show its utility in regularizing a neural network model to maintain desired causal effects, without compromising on accuracy. Importantly, we also show that a model thus trained is robust and gets improved accuracy on noisy inputs.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

30 of 62 references.

References · 30

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  3. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  4. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  5. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
  6. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  7. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
  8. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  9. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
  10. 2017CausalGAN: Learning Causal Implicit Generative Models with Adversarial Trainingcited by 152
  11. 2019Causal Discovery with Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  12. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
18 more
  1. 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
  2. 2018Robustly Disentangled Causal Mechanisms: Validating Deep Representations for Interventional Robustnesscited by 108
  3. 2020Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored Dynamicscited by 93
  4. 2019Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curvescited by 90
  5. 2019Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspectivecited by 77
  6. 2018Knowledge Transfer with Jacobian Matchingcited by 73
  7. 2017Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functionscited by 62
  8. 2017A causal framework for explaining the predictions of black-box sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 58
  9. 2020Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Image Classifiers: A Causal Perspective Using Counterfactualscited by 56
  10. 2020CausalVAE: Structured Causal Disentanglement in Variational Autoencodercited by 47
  11. 2020CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph Discoverycited by 41
  12. 2015Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tablescited by 35
  13. 2020Counterexample-Guided Learning of Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 34
  14. 2019Causal Regularizationcited by 21
  15. 2019How to Incorporate Monotonicity in Deep Networks While Preserving Flexibility?cited by 21
  16. 2021Contrastive ACE: Domain Generalization Through Alignment of Causal Mechanismscited by 20
  17. 2020A Causal Lens for Peeking into Black Box Predictive Models: Predictive Model Interpretation via Causal Attributioncited by 5
  18. 2018Supervising Feature Influencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

10 papers.