mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XAI-Refine: An Automated Explanation-Knowledge Loop for Brain-Age Prediction

arXiv 2609.09388 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.LG q-bio.NCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Brain-age prediction models are commonly evaluated by predictive accuracy, yet accurate predictions alone do not establish that a model relies on reproducible or neurobiologically supported mechanisms. Post-hoc explanation methods can expose these mechanisms, but existing workflows typically stop at diagnosis or require correction targets to be specified before model analysis. We propose XAI-Refine, an automated explanation-knowledge loop for brain-age prediction from resting-state functional connectivity. At each iteration, XAI-Refine consolidates complementary post-hoc analyses across repeated training runs into reliable, structured model explanations. It converts each reliable explanation into a neutral neurobiological question, retrieves and verifies relevant literature, and compiles the verified evidence into an admissible set in the same typed explanation space. The target for refinement is defined as the minimal projection of the current model explanation onto the admissible set induced by applicable verified knowledge. This revised explanation is then translated into a differentiable constraint while preserving the originating model variable, measurement operator, and applicable scope. Candidate updates are promoted only when multi-seed validation confirms target-directed explanatory movement, predictive performance remains within a prespecified guardrail, and non-target explanatory drift remains bounded. Experiments on functional-connectivity-based brain-age prediction evaluate predictive performance, explanation reliability, literature alignment, and target-specific model revision, illustrating a structured route from post-hoc analysis to evidence-guided model refinement.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 506
  4. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  5. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  6. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  7. 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 270
  8. 2022SciFact-Open: Towards open-domain scientific claim verificationcited by 94
  9. 2025SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verificationcited by 17
  10. 2021Matching Learned Causal Effects of Neural Networks with Domain Priorscited by 10
  11. 2019Aggregating explanation methods for stable and robust explainabilitycited by 9
  12. 2025Large Language Models as Attribution Regularizers for Efficient Model Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ReBA-Pred-Net: Weakly-Supervised Regional Brain Age Prediction on MRI
  2. 2023Prototype Learning for Explainable Brain Age Prediction
  3. 2025Bridging Foundation Models and Efficient Architectures: A Modular Brain Imaging Framework with Local Masking and Pretrained Representation Learning
  4. 2025Accurate and Interpretable Postmenstrual Age Prediction via Multimodal Large Language Model
  5. 2025Neural Autoregressive Modeling of Brain Aging
  6. 2025REMEMBER: Retrieval-based Explainable Multimodal Evidence-guided Modeling for Brain Evaluation and Reasoning in Zero- and Few-shot Neurodegenerative Diagnosis
  7. 2024Semi-Supervised Diffusion Model for Brain Age Prediction
  8. 2026NeuronSifter: An Agent-in-Twin for Prioritizing Central Nervous System Interventions with World Action Models