Talk-to-Resolve: Combining scene understanding and spatial dialogue to resolve granular task ambiguity for a collocated robot
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The utility of collocating robots largely depends on the easy and intuitive interaction mechanism with the human. If a robot accepts task instruction in natural language, first, it has to understand the user's intention by decoding the instruction. However, while executing the task, the robot may face unforeseeable circumstances due to the variations in the observed scene and therefore requires further user intervention. In this article, we present a system called Talk-to-Resolve (TTR) that enables a robot to initiate a coherent dialogue exchange with the instructor by observing the scene visually to resolve the impasse. Through dialogue, it either finds a cue to move forward in the original plan, an acceptable alternative to the original plan, or affirmation to abort the task altogether. To realize the possible stalemate, we utilize the dense captions of the observed scene and the given instruction jointly to compute the robot's next action. We evaluate our system based on a data set of initial instruction and situational scene pairs. Our system can identify the stalemate and resolve them with appropriate dialogue exchange with 82% accuracy. Additionally, a user study reveals that the questions from our systems are more natural (4.02 on average on a scale of 1 to 5) as compared to a state-of-the-art (3.08 on average).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2021.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
- 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
- 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
- 2015DenseCap: Fully Convolutional Localization Networks for Dense Captioningcited by 176
- 2018Mapping Instructions to Actions in 3D Environments with Visual Goal Predictioncited by 101
- 2019Zero-Shot Grounding of Objects from Natural Language Queriescited by 79
- 2017Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challengecited by 76
- 2017Interactively Picking Real-World Objects with Unconstrained Spoken Language Instructionscited by 61
- 2018Interactive Visual Grounding of Referring Expressions for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 55
11 more
- 2021INVIGORATE: Interactive Visual Grounding and Grasping in Cluttercited by 32
- 2019Improving Grounded Natural Language Understanding through Human-Robot Dialogcited by 25
- 2019Understanding Natural Language Instructions for Fetching Daily Objects Using GAN-Based Multimodal Target-Source Classificationcited by 16
- 2017YEDDA: A Lightweight Collaborative Text Span Annotation Toolcited by 13
- 2019Enabling Robots to Understand Incomplete Natural Language Instructions Using Commonsense Reasoningcited by 13
- 2020DeComplex: Task planning from complex natural instructions by a collocating robotcited by 10
- 2017A Review of Methodologies for Natural-Language-Facilitated Human-Robot Cooperationcited by 8
- 2019Grounding Language Attributes to Objects using Bayesian Eigenobjectscited by 8
- 2017Asking the Difficult Questions: Goal-Oriented Visual Question Generation via Intermediate Rewardscited by 7
- 2020Enabling human-like task identification from natural conversationcited by 5
- 2020Your instruction may be crisp, but not clear to me!cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Understanding Embodied Reference with Touch-Line Transformercited by 16
- 2025IRef-VLA: A Benchmark for Interactive Referential Grounding with Imperfect Language in 3D Scenescited by 8
- 2022DoRO: Disambiguation of referred object for embodied agentscited by 5
- 2023tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructionscited by 1
- 2025Situationally-Aware Dynamics Learningcited by 1
- 2025Toward Ownership Understanding of Objects: Active Question Generation with Large Language Model and Probabilistic Generative Modelcited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty, Vagueness, and Ambiguity in Human-Robot Interaction: Why Conceptualization Matterscited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty, Vagueness, and Ambiguity in Human-Robot Interaction: Why Conceptualization Matters10 Mar 2026
- 2025Toward Ownership Understanding of Objects: Active Question Generation with Large Language Model and Probabilistic Generative Model16 Sep 2025
- 2025Situationally-Aware Dynamics Learning26 May 2025
- 2025IRef-VLA: A Benchmark for Interactive Referential Grounding with Imperfect Language in 3D Scenes20 Mar 2025
- 2023tagE: Enabling an Embodied Agent to Understand Human Instructions24 Oct 2023
- 2022Understanding Embodied Reference with Touch-Line Transformer11 Oct 2022
- 2022DoRO: Disambiguation of referred object for embodied agents28 Jul 2022