mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DoRO: Disambiguation of referred object for embodied agents

arXiv 2207.14205 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2022cs.RO cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robotic task instructions often involve a referred object that the robot must locate (ground) within the environment. While task intent understanding is an essential part of natural language understanding, less effort is made to resolve ambiguity that may arise while grounding the task. Existing works use vision-based task grounding and ambiguity detection, suitable for a fixed view and a static robot. However, the problem magnifies for a mobile robot, where the ideal view is not known beforehand. Moreover, a single view may not be sufficient to locate all the object instances in the given area, which leads to inaccurate ambiguity detection. Human intervention is helpful only if the robot can convey the kind of ambiguity it is facing. In this article, we present DoRO (Disambiguation of Referred Object), a system that can help an embodied agent to disambiguate the referred object by raising a suitable query whenever required. Given an area where the intended object is, DoRO finds all the instances of the object by aggregating observations from multiple views while exploring & scanning the area. It then raises a suitable query using the information from the grounded object instances. Experiments conducted with the AI2Thor simulator show that DoRO not only detects the ambiguity more accurately but also raises verbose queries with more accurate information from the visual-language grounding.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2022.

Builds on

27 of 32 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  2. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  4. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  5. 2019ScanRefer: 3D Object Localization in RGB-D Scans using Natural Languagecited by 446
  6. 2020Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic Explorationcited by 421
  7. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  8. 2020TOD-BERT: Pre-trained Natural Language Understanding for Task-Oriented Dialoguecited by 185
  9. 2021InstanceRefer: Cooperative Holistic Understanding for Visual Grounding on Point Clouds through Instance Multi-level Contextual Referringcited by 140
  10. 2019Zero-Shot Grounding of Objects from Natural Language Queriescited by 79
  11. 2017Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challengecited by 76
  12. 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
15 more
  1. 2017Interactively Picking Real-World Objects with Unconstrained Spoken Language Instructionscited by 61
  2. 2018Interactive Visual Grounding of Referring Expressions for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 55
  3. 2021INVIGORATE: Interactive Visual Grounding and Grasping in Cluttercited by 32
  4. 2019Improving Grounded Natural Language Understanding through Human-Robot Dialogcited by 25
  5. 2019Embodied Language Grounding with 3D Visual Feature Representationscited by 20
  6. 2022Interactive Robotic Grasping with Attribute-Guided Disambiguationcited by 19
  7. 2019Object Finding in Cluttered Scenes Using Interactive Perceptioncited by 18
  8. 2019Understanding Natural Language Instructions for Fetching Daily Objects Using GAN-Based Multimodal Target-Source Classificationcited by 16
  9. 2019Enabling Robots to Understand Incomplete Natural Language Instructions Using Commonsense Reasoningcited by 13
  10. 2021VISITRON: Visual Semantics-Aligned Interactively Trained Object-Navigatorcited by 13
  11. 2020DeComplex: Task planning from complex natural instructions by a collocating robotcited by 10
  12. 2019Grounding Language Attributes to Objects using Bayesian Eigenobjectscited by 8
  13. 2021Talk-to-Resolve: Combining scene understanding and spatial dialogue to resolve granular task ambiguity for a collocated robotcited by 7
  14. 2020Enabling human-like task identification from natural conversationcited by 5
  15. 2020Your instruction may be crisp, but not clear to me!cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.