When and how epochwise double descent happens
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are known to exhibit a `double descent' behavior as the number of parameters increases. Recently, it has also been shown that an `epochwise double descent' effect exists in which the generalization error initially drops, then rises, and finally drops again with increasing training time. This presents a practical problem in that the amount of time required for training is long, and early stopping based on validation performance may result in suboptimal generalization. In this work we develop an analytically tractable model of epochwise double descent that allows us to characterise theoretically when this effect is likely to occur. This model is based on the hypothesis that the training data contains features that are slow to learn but informative. We then show experimentally that deep neural networks behave similarly to our theoretical model. Our findings indicate that epochwise double descent requires a critical amount of noise to occur, but above a second critical noise level early stopping remains effective. Using insights from theory, we give two methods by which epochwise double descent can be removed: one that removes slow to learn features from the input and reduces generalization performance, and another that instead modifies the training dynamics and matches or exceeds the generalization performance of standard training. Taken together, our results suggest a new picture of how epochwise double descent emerges from the interplay between the dynamics of training and noise in the training data.
Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2021.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
8 more
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 203
- 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
- 2021On the geometry of generalization and memorization in deep neural networkscited by 71
- 2020A Brief Prehistory of Double Descentcited by 44
- 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
- 2019More Data Can Hurt for Linear Regression: Sample-wise Double Descentcited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
20 papers.
Sort:
- 2023Unifying Grokking and Double Descentcited by 49
- 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
- 2023Over-training with Mixup May Hurt Generalizationcited by 13
- 2022Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Modelscited by 5
- 2024Towards Understanding Epoch-wise Double descent in Two-layer Linear Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2023United We Stand: Using Epoch-wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfitcited by 2
- 2024Unified Neural Network Scaling Laws and Scale-time Equivalencecited by 2
- 2024On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025A dynamic view of some anomalous phenomena in SGDcited by 2
- 2024Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Datacited by 1
- 2022With Greater Distance Comes Worse Performance: On the Perspective of Layer Utilization and Model Generalizationcited by 0
8 more
- 2023Double Descent of Discrepancy: A Task-, Data-, and Model-Agnostic Phenomenoncited by 0
- 2023Relearning Forgotten Knowledge: on Forgetting, Overfit and Training-Free Ensembles of DNNscited by 0
- 2023Deep Double Descent for Time Series Forecasting: Avoiding Undertrained Modelscited by 0
- 2024Double Descent Meets Out-of-Distribution Detection: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Analysis on the role of model complexitycited by 0
- 2025On the Relationship Between Double Descent of CNNs and Shape/Texture Bias Under Learning Processcited by 0
- 2025Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting with Knowledge Fusion and Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Deep Exploration of Epoch-wise Double Descent in Noisy Data: Signal Separation, Large Activation, and Benign Overfittingcited by 0
- 2026A Data-dependent Early Stopping Rule using Rademacher Complexity with L1-normcited by 0
- 2026A Data-dependent Early Stopping Rule using Rademacher Complexity with L1-norm25 Aug 2026
- 2026Deep Exploration of Epoch-wise Double Descent in Noisy Data: Signal Separation, Large Activation, and Benign Overfitting13 Jan 2026
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Data1 Sep 2025
- 2025Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting with Knowledge Fusion and Distillation11 Jul 2025
- 2025A dynamic view of some anomalous phenomena in SGD3 May 2025
- 2025On the Relationship Between Double Descent of CNNs and Shape/Texture Bias Under Learning Process4 Mar 2025
- 2024On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networks17 Dec 2024
- 2024Double Descent Meets Out-of-Distribution Detection: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Analysis on the role of model complexity4 Nov 2024
- 2024Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labels10 Sep 2024
- 2024Unified Neural Network Scaling Laws and Scale-time Equivalence9 Sep 2024
- 2024Towards Understanding Epoch-wise Double descent in Two-layer Linear Neural Networks13 Jul 2024
- 2023Deep Double Descent for Time Series Forecasting: Avoiding Undertrained Models2 Nov 2023
8 more
- 2023Relearning Forgotten Knowledge: on Forgetting, Overfit and Training-Free Ensembles of DNNs17 Oct 2023
- 2023United We Stand: Using Epoch-wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfit17 Oct 2023
- 2023Double Descent of Discrepancy: A Task-, Data-, and Model-Agnostic Phenomenon25 May 2023
- 2023Unifying Grokking and Double Descent10 Mar 2023
- 2023Over-training with Mixup May Hurt Generalization2 Mar 2023
- 2022Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Models1 Jun 2022
- 2022With Greater Distance Comes Worse Performance: On the Perspective of Layer Utilization and Model Generalization28 Jan 2022
- 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent6 Dec 2021
- 2023Unifying Grokking and Double Descentcited by 49
- 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
- 2023Over-training with Mixup May Hurt Generalizationcited by 13
- 2022Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Modelscited by 5
- 2024Towards Understanding Epoch-wise Double descent in Two-layer Linear Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2023United We Stand: Using Epoch-wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfitcited by 2
- 2024Unified Neural Network Scaling Laws and Scale-time Equivalencecited by 2
- 2024On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025A dynamic view of some anomalous phenomena in SGDcited by 2
- 2024Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Datacited by 1
- 2022With Greater Distance Comes Worse Performance: On the Perspective of Layer Utilization and Model Generalizationcited by 0
12 most cited of 20 All 20 (JSON)
- 2026A Data-dependent Early Stopping Rule using Rademacher Complexity with L1-norm25 Aug 2026
- 2026Deep Exploration of Epoch-wise Double Descent in Noisy Data: Signal Separation, Large Activation, and Benign Overfitting13 Jan 2026
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Data1 Sep 2025
- 2025Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting with Knowledge Fusion and Distillation11 Jul 2025
- 2025A dynamic view of some anomalous phenomena in SGD3 May 2025
- 2025On the Relationship Between Double Descent of CNNs and Shape/Texture Bias Under Learning Process4 Mar 2025
- 2024On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networks17 Dec 2024
- 2024Double Descent Meets Out-of-Distribution Detection: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Analysis on the role of model complexity4 Nov 2024
- 2024Noisy Early Stopping for Noisy Labels10 Sep 2024
- 2024Unified Neural Network Scaling Laws and Scale-time Equivalence9 Sep 2024
- 2024Towards Understanding Epoch-wise Double descent in Two-layer Linear Neural Networks13 Jul 2024
- 2023Deep Double Descent for Time Series Forecasting: Avoiding Undertrained Models2 Nov 2023
12 newest of 20 All 20 (JSON)