mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Relearning Forgotten Knowledge: on Forgetting, Overfit and Training-Free Ensembles of DNNs

arXiv 2310.11094 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The infrequent occurrence of overfit in deep neural networks is perplexing. On the one hand, theory predicts that as models get larger they should eventually become too specialized for a specific training set, with ensuing decrease in generalization. In contrast, empirical results in image classification indicate that increasing the training time of deep models or using bigger models almost never hurts generalization. Is it because the way we measure overfit is too limited? Here, we introduce a novel score for quantifying overfit, which monitors the forgetting rate of deep models on validation data. Presumably, this score indicates that even while generalization improves overall, there are certain regions of the data space where it deteriorates. When thus measured, we show that overfit can occur with and without a decrease in validation accuracy, and may be more common than previously appreciated. This observation may help to clarify the aforementioned confusing picture. We use our observations to construct a new ensemble method, based solely on the training history of a single network, which provides significant improvement in performance without any additional cost in training time. An extensive empirical evaluation with modern deep models shows our method's utility on multiple datasets, neural networks architectures and training schemes, both when training from scratch and when using pre-trained networks in transfer learning. Notably, our method outperforms comparable methods while being easier to implement and use, and further improves the performance of competitive networks on Imagenet by 1%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  4. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  5. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  6. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  7. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  8. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  9. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  10. 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
  11. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  12. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 350
7 more
  1. 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 284
  2. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  3. 2021A Survey on Ensemble Learning under the Era of Deep Learningcited by 47
  4. 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 41
  5. 2022Stochastic Weight Averaging Revisitedcited by 26
  6. 2013Horizontal and Vertical Ensemble with Deep Representation for Classificationcited by 22
  7. 2021When and how epochwise double descent happenscited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.