mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Data-dependent Early Stopping Rule using Rademacher Complexity with L1-norm

arXiv 2608.24210 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training neural networks requires balancing the trade-off between fitting the training data and achieving robust performance on unseen inputs. This ability, commonly referred to as generalizability, is determined by the gap between the empirical risk on the training set (``empirical loss'') and the expected risk over the data distribution (``generalization error''). Existing approaches typically estimate the generalization error numerically, requiring gradient descent training and an ``early stopping'' strategy. In this work, we introduce an analytic framework that estimates the optimal time of early stopping without the need for training. Several works in the literature also give such analytical estimations, but they are generally based on random matrix theory and often make assumptions on the distribution of the data or the eigenvalue distribution of the covariance matrix. In contrast, our work is based on Rademacher complexity (RC) without needing such probabilistic assumptions. For both theoretical and numerical reasons, it is more relevant to express RC with the L1- norm rather than with the L2-norm. We focus on the case of linear models and the problem of linear regression. Thanks to the ``linear probing'' method, our results can, however, be successfully applied to nonlinear neural networks, as illustrated in the classification MNIST example.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  4. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  5. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  6. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  7. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  8. 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
  9. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
  10. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  11. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
  12. 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
7 more
  1. 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 67
  2. 2019Generalization Guarantees for Neural Networks via Harnessing the Low-rank Structure of the Jacobiancited by 67
  3. 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
  4. 2022Characterizing the Spectrum of the NTK via a Power Series Expansioncited by 22
  5. 2021When and how epochwise double descent happenscited by 20
  6. 2018The Dynamics of Learning: A Random Matrix Approachcited by 15
  7. 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regressioncited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.