mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Over-training with Mixup May Hurt Generalization

arXiv 2303.01475 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2023cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mixup, which creates synthetic training instances by linearly interpolating random sample pairs, is a simple and yet effective regularization technique to boost the performance of deep models trained with SGD. In this work, we report a previously unobserved phenomenon in Mixup training: on a number of standard datasets, the performance of Mixup-trained models starts to decay after training for a large number of epochs, giving rise to a U-shaped generalization curve. This behavior is further aggravated when the size of original dataset is reduced. To help understand such a behavior of Mixup, we show theoretically that Mixup training may introduce undesired data-dependent label noises to the synthesized data. Via analyzing a least-square regression problem with a random feature model, we explain why noisy labels may cause the U-shaped curve to occur: Mixup improves generalization through fitting the clean patterns at the early training stage, but as training progresses, Mixup becomes over-fitting to the noise in the synthetic data. Extensive experiments are performed on a variety of benchmark datasets, validating this explanation.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.

Builds on

38 of 51 references.

References · 38

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  7. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  8. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  9. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  10. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  11. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  12. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
26 more
  1. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  2. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  3. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  4. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  5. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
  6. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  7. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
  8. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  9. 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
  10. 2022G-Mixup: Graph Data Augmentation for Graph Classificationcited by 145
  11. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  12. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  13. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  14. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
  15. 2019Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergencecited by 54
  16. 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 40
  17. 2021On the Generalization of Models Trained with SGD: Information-Theoretic Bounds and Implicationscited by 31
  18. 2022RegMixup: Mixup as a Regularizer Can Surprisingly Improve Accuracy and Out Distribution Robustnesscited by 27
  19. 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
  20. 2021When and how epochwise double descent happenscited by 20
  21. 2018The Dynamics of Learning: A Random Matrix Approachcited by 15
  22. 2021Neural Network Weights Do Not Converge to Stationary Points: An Invariant Measure Perspectivecited by 15
  23. 2019MixUp as Directional Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
  24. 2021k-Mixup Regularization for Deep Learning via Optimal Transportcited by 14
  25. 2021Label Noise in Adversarial Training: A Novel Perspective to Study Robust Overfittingcited by 14
  26. 2022GenLabel: Mixup Relabeling using Generative Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: