On the Relationship Between Double Descent of CNNs and Shape/Texture Bias Under Learning Process
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The double descent phenomenon, which deviates from the traditional bias-variance trade-off theory, attracts considerable research attention; however, the mechanism of its occurrence is not fully understood. On the other hand, in the study of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image recognition, methods are proposed to quantify the bias on shape features versus texture features in images, determining which features the CNN focuses on more. In this work, we hypothesize that there is a relationship between the shape/texture bias in the learning process of CNNs and epoch-wise double descent, and we conduct verification. As a result, we discover double descent/ascent of shape/texture bias synchronized with double descent of test error under conditions where epoch-wise double descent is observed. Quantitative evaluations confirm this correlation between the test errors and the bias values from the initial decrease to the full increase in test error. Interestingly, double descent/ascent of shape/texture bias is observed in some cases even in conditions without label noise, where double descent is thought not to occur. These experimental results are considered to contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms behind the double descent phenomenon and the learning process of CNNs in image recognition.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
12 more
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 241
- 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
- 2020Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itcited by 41
- 2022Sparse Double Descent: Where Network Pruning Aggravates Overfittingcited by 26
- 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
- 2021When and how epochwise double descent happenscited by 21
- 2022Contributions of Shape, Texture, and Color in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2023Loss Spike in Training Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11
- 2020Overfitting or Underfitting? Understand Robustness Drop in Adversarial Trainingcited by 5
- 2023Sparse Double Descent in Vision Transformers: real or phantom threat?cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.