A Personalized Framework for Consumer and Producer Group Fairness Optimization in Recommender Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition that when machine learning (ML) algorithms are used to automate decisions, they may mistreat individuals or groups, with legal, ethical, or economic implications. Recommender systems are prominent examples of these machine learning (ML) systems that aid users in making decisions. The majority of past literature research on RS fairness treats user and item fairness concerns independently, ignoring the fact that recommender systems function in a two-sided marketplace. In this paper, we propose CP-FairRank, an optimization-based re-ranking algorithm that seamlessly integrates fairness constraints from both the consumer and producer side in a joint objective framework. The framework is generalizable and may take into account varied fairness settings based on group segmentation, recommendation model selection, and domain, which is one of its key characteristics. For instance, we demonstrate that the system may jointly increase consumer and producer fairness when (un)protected consumer groups are defined on the basis of their activity level and main-streamness, while producer groups are defined according to their popularity level. For empirical validation, through large-scale on eight datasets and four mainstream collaborative filtering (CF) recommendation models, we demonstrate that our proposed strategy is able to improve both consumer and producer fairness without compromising or very little overall recommendation quality, demonstrating the role algorithms may play in avoiding data biases.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.
Builds on
34 of 61 references.
References · 34
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
- 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
- 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
- 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
- 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
- 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
- 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
22 more
- 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
- 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
- 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 69
- 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
- 2021User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 38
- 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
- 2022Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directionscited by 30
- 2022CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systemscited by 29
- 2021Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancecited by 28
- 2021Fairness in Information Access Systemscited by 27
- 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recencycited by 27
- 2021Multi-FR: A Multi-objective Optimization Framework for Multi-stakeholder Fairness-aware Recommendationcited by 25
- 2020User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Marketscited by 23
- 2020Interplay between Upsampling and Regularization for Provider Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 15
- 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgmentscited by 14
- 2022The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendationcited by 14
- 2023Fairness of ChatGPT and the Role Of Explainable-Guided Promptscited by 13
- 2023Improving Conversational Recommendation Systems via Bias Analysis and Language-Model-Enhanced Data Augmentationcited by 11
- 2023Provider Fairness and Beyond-Accuracy Trade-offs in Recommender Systemscited by 6
- 2023ChatGPT-HealthPrompt. Harnessing the Power of XAI in Prompt-Based Healthcare Decision Support using ChatGPTcited by 5
- 2022Towards Confidence-aware Calibrated Recommendationcited by 4
- 2022Exploring the Impact of Temporal Bias in Point-of-Interest Recommendationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.