Overview of the TREC 2019 Fair Ranking Track
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of the TREC Fair Ranking track was to develop a benchmark for evaluating retrieval systems in terms of fairness to different content providers in addition to classic notions of relevance. As part of the benchmark, we defined standardized fairness metrics with evaluation protocols and released a dataset for the fair ranking problem. The 2019 task focused on reranking academic paper abstracts given a query. The objective was to fairly represent relevant authors from several groups that were unknown at the system submission time. Thus, the track emphasized the development of systems which have robust performance across a variety of group definitions. Participants were provided with querylog data (queries, documents, and relevance) from Semantic Scholar. This paper presents an overview of the track, including the task definition, descriptions of the data and the annotation process, as well as a comparison of the performance of submitted systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgmentscited by 14
- 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
- 2023Fairness in Image Search: A Study of Occupational Stereotyping in Image Retrieval and its Debiasingcited by 0
- 2025Quantifying Misattribution Unfairness in Authorship Attributioncited by 0
- 2025Quantifying Misattribution Unfairness in Authorship Attribution2 Jun 2025
- 2023Fairness in Image Search: A Study of Occupational Stereotyping in Image Retrieval and its Debiasing6 May 2023
- 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments11 Aug 2021
- 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rank11 Feb 2021