mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exposure-Based Reinforcement Learning to Rank

arXiv 2607.18689 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) methods for learning-to-rank (LTR) can optimize (almost) any ranking goal, e.g., from precision or discounted cumulative gain to fairness-of-exposure or ranking distillation. However, standard RL is ineffective and computationally costly due to the enormous action space in LTR settings. Existing methods reach computational efficiency through custom gradient computation algorithms, but they are very complex to implement and often clash with auto-differentiation. Consequently, existing RL for LTR is not attractive to many practitioners. We reconsider RL for LTR while actively avoiding reliance on custom gradients. Contrary to the existing approaches, we focus on variance reduction and GPU computation. In doing so, we discover that high sample-efficiency can be reached through baseline corrections and partial marginalization. Furthermore, we propose an abstraction that places gradient estimation behind a document-exposure distribution, this enables seamless plug-and-play integration with auto-differentiation. Thereby, one only has to implement a loss as a differentiable function of exposure and RL for LTR can optimize it using auto-differentiation. Our experimental results reveal that our new exposure-based RL for LTR approach converges considerably faster and at significantly higher ranking performance than existing custom gradients, with no additional costs in computation time when using GPUs. In contrast, existing custom gradients result in severe stability issues when converging over many epochs, which never occur for our methods. Thus, we considerably improve RL for LTR methodology by increasing its effectiveness, efficiency, and ease of application.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 63 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
  3. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  4. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
  5. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  6. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  7. 2019Stochastic Optimization of Sorting Networks via Continuous Relaxationscited by 111
  8. 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
  9. 2018Ranking Distillation: Learning Compact Ranking Models With High Performance for Recommender Systemcited by 60
  10. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  11. 2021NeuralNDCG: Direct Optimisation of a Ranking Metric via Differentiable Relaxation of Sortingcited by 39
  12. 2021Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairnesscited by 35
10 more
  1. 2018TF-Ranking: Scalable TensorFlow Library for Learning-to-Rankcited by 32
  2. 2018Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rankcited by 24
  3. 2022Doubly-Robust Estimation for Correcting Position-Bias in Click Feedback for Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 17
  4. 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgmentscited by 14
  5. 2020StochasticRank: Global Optimization of Scale-Free Discrete Functionscited by 13
  6. 2022Learning-to-Rank at the Speed of Sampling: Plackett-Luce Gradient Estimation With Minimal Computational Complexitycited by 13
  7. 2024Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Banditscited by 13
  8. 2020Taking the Counterfactual Online: Efficient and Unbiased Online Evaluation for Rankingcited by 8
  9. 2023RD-Suite: A Benchmark for Ranking Distillationcited by 7
  10. 2018Ranking for Relevance and Display Preferences in Complex Presentation Layoutscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.