mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Author Gender in Book Rating and Recommendation

arXiv 1808.07586 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2018cs.IR cs.HCcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Collaborative filtering algorithms find useful patterns in rating and consumption data and exploit these patterns to guide users to good items. Many of the patterns in rating datasets reflect important real-world differences between the various users and items in the data; other patterns may be irrelevant or possibly undesirable for social or ethical reasons, particularly if they reflect undesired discrimination, such as discrimination in publishing or purchasing against authors who are women or ethnic minorities. In this work, we examine the response of collaborative filtering recommender algorithms to the distribution of their input data with respect to a dimension of social concern, namely content creator gender. Using publicly-available book ratings data, we measure the distribution of the genders of the authors of books in user rating profiles and recommendation lists produced from this data. We find that common collaborative filtering algorithms differ in the gender distribution of their recommendation lists, and in the relationship of that output distribution to user profile distribution.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

29 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021EDITS: Modeling and Mitigating Data Bias for Graph Neural Networkscited by 92
  2. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  3. 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
  4. 2022Unlearning Protected User Attributes in Recommendations with Adversarial Trainingcited by 19
  5. 2023Improving Recommendation Fairness via Data Augmentationcited by 18
  6. 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Banditcited by 15
  7. 2021Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgmentscited by 14
  8. 2021Revisiting Popularity and Demographic Biases in Recommender Evaluation and Effectivenesscited by 12
  9. 2021Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspectivecited by 10
  10. 2021Quantifying Availability and Discovery in Recommender Systems via Stochastic Reachabilitycited by 8
  11. 2022Cascaded Debiasing: Studying the Cumulative Effect of Multiple Fairness-Enhancing Interventionscited by 6
  12. 2023Maximizing Submodular Functions for Recommendation in the Presence of Biasescited by 5
17 more
  1. 2024Achieving Fairness Across Local and Global Models in Federated Learningcited by 5
  2. 2023When Newer is Not Better: Does Deep Learning Really Benefit Recommendation From Implicit Feedback?cited by 4
  3. 2024Path-Specific Causal Reasoning for Fairness-aware Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 4
  4. 2021Algorithms are not neutral: Bias in collaborative filteringcited by 3
  5. 2021An Adaptive Boosting Technique to Mitigate Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 2
  6. 2022Diversely Regularized Matrix Factorization for Accurate and Aggregately Diversified Recommendationcited by 2
  7. 2023Break Out of a Pigeonhole: A Unified Framework for Examining Miscalibration, Bias, and Stereotype in Recommender Systemscited by 2
  8. 2024DifFaiRec: Generative Fair Recommender with Conditional Diffusion Modelcited by 2
  9. 2024Overhead-free User-side Recommender Systemscited by 2
  10. 2025Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systemscited by 2
  11. 2024MOReGIn: Multi-Objective Recommendation at the Global and Individual Levelscited by 1
  12. 2026Polarization by Default: Auditing Recommendation Bias in LLM-Based Content Curationcited by 1
  13. 2022Hidden Author Bias in Book Recommendationcited by 0
  14. 2025Fuck the Algorithm: Conceptual Issues in Algorithmic Biascited by 0
  15. 2026SOMtime the World Ain't Fair: Violating Fairness Using Self-Organizing Mapscited by 0
  16. 2026Who Decides What Is Harmful? Content Moderation Policy Through A Multi-Agent Personalised Inference Frameworkcited by 0
  17. 2026AgentRecommender: LLM Agents Enable Customizable Recommender Systems on the User Sidecited by 0