mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounders

arXiv 2107.02772 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of determining the best intervention in a Causal Bayesian Network (CBN) specified only by its causal graph. We model this as a stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with side-information, where the interventions correspond to the arms of the bandit instance. First, we propose a simple regret minimization algorithm that takes as input a semi-Markovian causal graph with atomic interventions and possibly unobservable variables, and achieves tildeO(√M/T) expected simple regret, where M is dependent on the input CBN and could be very small compared to the number of arms. We also show that this is almost optimal for CBNs described by causal graphs having an n-ary tree structure. Our simple regret minimization results, both upper and lower bound, subsume previous results in the literature, which assumed additional structural restrictions on the input causal graph. In particular, our results indicate that the simple regret guarantee of our proposed algorithm can only be improved by considering more nuanced structural restrictions on the causal graph. Next, we propose a cumulative regret minimization algorithm that takes as input a general causal graph with all observable nodes and atomic interventions and performs better than the optimal MAB algorithm that does not take causal side-information into account. We also experimentally compare both our algorithms with the best known algorithms in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, this work gives the first simple and cumulative regret minimization algorithms for CBNs with general causal graphs under atomic interventions and having unobserved confounders.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2021.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 100
  3. 2013Causal Networks: Semantics and Expressivenesscited by 67
  4. 2017Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Samplingcited by 39
  5. 2020Budgeted and Non-budgeted Causal Banditscited by 38
  6. 2021Causal Bandits with Unknown Graph Structurecited by 37
  7. 2018Learning and Testing Causal Models with Interventionscited by 29
  8. 2016Contextual Bandits with Latent Confounders: An NMF Approachcited by 26
  9. 2018Causal Bandits with Propagating Inferencecited by 23
  10. 2021Causal Markov Decision Processes: Learning Good Interventions Efficientlycited by 7
  11. 2020Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: