Causal Bandit Over Unknown Graphs: Upper Confidence Bounds With Backdoor Adjustment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The causal bandit problem seeks to identify, through sequential experimentation, an intervention that maximizes the expected reward in a causal system modeled by a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Existing methods typically assume that the causal graph is known or impose restrictive structural assumptions. In this paper, we study causal bandit problems when the causal graph is unknown. We first consider Gaussian DAG models without latent confounders. By combining observational and experimental data collected sequentially during the bandit process, we identify candidate backdoor adjustment sets for each intervention arm. These sets enable estimation of causal effects and construction of upper confidence bounds that integrate information from both data sources. Based on these estimates, we propose a new algorithm, termed backdoor-adjustment upper confidence bound (BA-UCB), for sequential intervention selection. We establish finite-time upper bounds on the cumulative regret of BA-UCB, showing improved rates and substantially relaxed dependency on the number of intervention arms compared to standard multi-armed bandit methods. We further extend the methodology and theoretical guarantees to settings with latent confounders, where the observed variables are modeled by an acyclic directed mixed graph. Simulation studies demonstrate that BA-UCB achieves substantially lower cumulative regret and favorable computational efficiency relative to existing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.
Builds on
13 of 33 references.
References · 13
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
- 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 101
- 2017Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Samplingcited by 39
- 2017Nested Markov Properties for Acyclic Directed Mixed Graphscited by 39
- 2020Budgeted and Non-budgeted Causal Banditscited by 38
- 2021Causal Bandits with Unknown Graph Structurecited by 37
- 2018Causal Bandits with Propagating Inferencecited by 23
- 2022Causal Bandits for Linear Structural Equation Modelscited by 19
- 2020Causal Bandits without prior knowledge using separating setscited by 17
- 2021A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounderscited by 15
- 2023Causal Bandits without Graph Learningcited by 10
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Graph Structured Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Nonlinear Reward Associations through Separable Signals
- 2025Competition is the key: A Game Theoretic Causal Discovery Approach
- 2023The Choice of Noninformative Priors for Thompson Sampling in Multiparameter Bandit Models
- 2024Linear Contextual Bandits with Interference
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Causal Discovery without Acyclicity Constraints
- 2025Information-directed sampling for bandits: a primer
- 2023Reward Learning as Doubly Nonparametric Bandits: Optimal Design and Scaling Laws
- 2025Empirical Bound Information-Directed Sampling for Norm-Agnostic Bandits