mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Bandits with General Causal Models and Interventions

arXiv 2403.00233 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers causal bandits (CBs) for the sequential design of interventions in a causal system. The objective is to optimize a reward function via minimizing a measure of cumulative regret with respect to the best sequence of interventions in hindsight. The paper advances the results on CBs in three directions. First, the structural causal models (SCMs) are assumed to be unknown and drawn arbitrarily from a general class F of Lipschitz-continuous functions. Existing results are often focused on (generalized) linear SCMs. Second, the interventions are assumed to be generalized soft with any desired level of granularity, resulting in an infinite number of possible interventions. The existing literature, in contrast, generally adopts atomic and hard interventions. Third, we provide general upper and lower bounds on regret. The upper bounds subsume (and improve) known bounds for special cases. The lower bounds are generally hitherto unknown. These bounds are characterized as functions of the (i) graph parameters, (ii) eluder dimension of the space of SCMs, denoted by operatornamedim(F), and (iii) the covering number of the function space, denoted by rm cn(F). Specifically, the cumulative achievable regret over horizon T is O(K dL-1√Toperatornamedim(F) log(rm cn(F))), where K is related to the Lipschitz constants, d is the graph's maximum in-degree, and L is the length of the longest causal path. The upper bound is further refined for special classes of SCMs (neural network, polynomial, and linear), and their corresponding lower bounds are provided.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Model-based Reinforcement Learning and the Eluder Dimensioncited by 116
  2. 2020CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learningcited by 109
  3. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 100
  4. 2019Randomized Exploration in Generalized Linear Banditscited by 70
  5. 2017Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Samplingcited by 39
  6. 2020Budgeted and Non-budgeted Causal Banditscited by 38
  7. 2021Causal Bandits with Unknown Graph Structurecited by 37
  8. 2022Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimizationcited by 26
  9. 2018Causal Bandits with Propagating Inferencecited by 23
  10. 2021Understanding the Eluder Dimensioncited by 19
  11. 2022Causal Bandits for Linear Structural Equation Modelscited by 19
  12. 2022Adaptively Exploiting d-Separators with Causal Banditscited by 18
9 more
  1. 2020Causal Bandits without prior knowledge using separating setscited by 17
  2. 2022Combinatorial Causal Banditscited by 16
  3. 2021A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounderscited by 15
  4. 2023Causal Bandits without Graph Learningcited by 10
  5. 2023Additive Causal Bandits with Unknown Graphcited by 10
  6. 2022Combinatorial Pure Exploration of Causal Banditscited by 9
  7. 2021A Short Note on the Relationship of Information Gain and Eluder Dimensioncited by 7
  8. 2023Combinatorial Causal Bandits without Graph Skeletoncited by 7
  9. 2023Learning Good Interventions in Causal Graphs via Coveringcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

7 papers.