mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Bandits with Propagating Inference

arXiv 1806.02252 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2018stat.ML cs.LGcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bandit is a framework for designing sequential experiments. In each experiment, a learner selects an arm A ∈ A and obtains an observation corresponding to A. Theoretically, the tight regret lower-bound for the general bandit is polynomial with respect to the number of arms |A|. This makes bandit incapable of handling an exponentially large number of arms, hence the bandit problem with side-information is often considered to overcome this lower bound. Recently, a bandit framework over a causal graph was introduced, where the structure of the causal graph is available as side-information. A causal graph is a fundamental model that is frequently used with a variety of real problems. In this setting, the arms are identified with interventions on a given causal graph, and the effect of an intervention propagates throughout all over the causal graph. The task is to find the best intervention that maximizes the expected value on a target node. Existing algorithms for causal bandit overcame the Omega(√|A|/T) simple-regret lower-bound; however, their algorithms work only when the interventions A are localized around a single node (i.e., an intervention propagates only to its neighbors). We propose a novel causal bandit algorithm for an arbitrary set of interventions, which can propagate throughout the causal graph. We also show that it achieves O(√ γ^*log(|A|T) / T) regret bound, where γ^* is determined by using a causal graph structure. In particular, if the in-degree of the causal graph is bounded, then γ^* = O(N2), where N is the number N of nodes.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023A Survey on Causal Reinforcement Learningcited by 43
  2. 2022Active Learning for Optimal Intervention Design in Causal Modelscited by 30
  3. 2023Causal Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 22
  4. 2022Causal Bandits for Linear Structural Equation Modelscited by 19
  5. 2021Invariant Policy Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  6. 2021Matching a Desired Causal State via Shift Interventionscited by 16
  7. 2022Combinatorial Causal Banditscited by 16
  8. 2021A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounderscited by 15
  9. 2022Combinatorial Pure Exploration of Causal Banditscited by 9
  10. 2023Combinatorial Causal Bandits without Graph Skeletoncited by 7
  11. 2024Causal Bandits with General Causal Models and Interventionscited by 7
  12. 2023Learning Good Interventions in Causal Graphs via Coveringcited by 5
11 more
  1. 2024Linear Causal Bandits: Unknown Graph and Soft Interventionscited by 5
  2. 2024Improved Bound for Robust Causal Bandits with Linear Modelscited by 2
  3. 2025Graph Learning Is Suboptimal in Causal Banditscited by 2
  4. 2021Intervention Efficient Algorithm for Two-Stage Causal MDPscited by 1
  5. 2024Causal Contextual Bandits with Adaptive Contextcited by 1
  6. 2025Causal Bandit Over Unknown Graphs: Upper Confidence Bounds With Backdoor Adjustmentcited by 1
  7. 2025The Minimal Search Space for Conditional Causal Banditscited by 1
  8. 2025Generator-Mediated Bandits: Thompson Sampling for GenAI-Powered Adaptive Interventionscited by 1
  9. 2021Hierarchical Causal Banditcited by 0
  10. 2021Identifying Best Fair Interventioncited by 0
  11. 2026Information-Directed Sampling for Causal Banditscited by 0