mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generator-Mediated Bandits: Thompson Sampling for GenAI-Powered Adaptive Interventions

arXiv 2505.16311 ↗First posted 22 May 2025stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models have enabled the generation of personalized content that adapts to up-to-date user context. While personalized decision systems are often modeled using bandit formulations, the integration of GenAI introduces new structure into otherwise classical sequential learning problems. In GenAI-powered interventions, the agent selects a query, but the environment experiences a stochastic response drawn from the generative model. Standard bandit methods do not explicitly account for this structure, where actions influence rewards only through stochastic, observed treatments. We introduce generator-mediated bandit-Thompson sampling (GAMBITTS), a bandit approach designed for this action/treatment split, using mobile health interventions with large language model-generated text as a motivating case study. GAMBITTS explicitly models both the treatment and reward generation processes, using information in the delivered treatment to accelerate policy learning relative to standard methods. We establish regret bounds for GAMBITTS by decomposing sources of uncertainty in treatment and reward, identifying conditions where it achieves stronger guarantees than standard bandit approaches. In simulation studies, GAMBITTS consistently outperforms conventional algorithms by leveraging observed treatments to more accurately estimate expected rewards.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  3. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 101
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Natural Language Action Spacecited by 88
  5. 2019Personalized HeartSteps: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Optimizing Physical Activitycited by 70
  6. 2017Ensemble Samplingcited by 62
  7. 2018How to Make Causal Inferences Using Textscited by 59
  8. 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
  9. 2020Causal Effects of Linguistic Propertiescited by 39
  10. 2016Assessing Time-Varying Causal Effect Moderation in Mobile Healthcited by 27
  11. 2016Contextual Bandits with Latent Confounders: An NMF Approachcited by 26
  12. 2022Pythae: Unifying Generative Autoencoders in Python -- A Benchmarking Use Casecited by 26
12 more
  1. 2020IntelligentPooling: Practical Thompson Sampling for mHealthcited by 24
  2. 2018Causal Bandits with Propagating Inferencecited by 23
  3. 2024Causal Inference with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Application to Texts as Treatmentscited by 16
  4. 2021A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounderscited by 15
  5. 2017Instrument-Armed Banditscited by 10
  6. 2020Personalized Policy Learning using Longitudinal Mobile Health Datacited by 10
  7. 2022Combinatorial Pure Exploration of Causal Banditscited by 9
  8. 2023Stochastic Online Instrumental Variable Regression: Regrets for Endogeneity and Bandit Feedbackcited by 7
  9. 2023RoME: A Robust Mixed-Effects Bandit Algorithm for Optimizing Mobile Health Interventionscited by 5
  10. 2024Information Capacity Regret Bounds for Bandits with Mediator Feedbackcited by 4
  11. 2018Thompson Sampling for Noncompliant Banditscited by 3
  12. 2024Causal Bandits: The Pareto Optimal Frontier of Adaptivity, a Reduction to Linear Bandits, and Limitations around Unknown Marginalscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.