mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Asymmetric Graph Error Control with Low Complexity in Causal Bandits

arXiv 2408.11240 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2024cs.LG eess.SPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, the causal bandit problem is investigated, with the objective of maximizing the long-term reward by selecting an optimal sequence of interventions on nodes in an unknown causal graph. It is assumed that both the causal topology and the distribution of interventions are unknown. First, based on the difference between the two types of graph identification errors (false positives and negatives), a causal graph learning method is proposed. Numerical results suggest that this method has a much lower sample complexity relative to the prior art by learning sub-graphs. However, we note that a sample complexity analysis for the new algorithm has not been undertaken, as of yet. Under the assumption of minimum-mean squared error weight estimation, a new uncertainty bound tailored to the causal bandit problem is derived. This uncertainty bound drives an upper confidence bound-based intervention selection to optimize the reward. Further, we consider a particular instance of non-stationary bandits wherein both the causal topology and interventional distributions can change. Our solution is the design of a sub-graph change detection mechanism that requires a modest number of samples. Numerical results compare the new methodology to existing schemes and show a substantial performance improvement in stationary and non-stationary settings. Averaged over 100 randomly generated causal bandits, the proposed scheme takes significantly fewer samples to learn the causal structure and achieves a reward gain of 85% compared to existing approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 49 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  2. 2020On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGscited by 186
  3. 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 135
  4. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 100
  5. 2020Budgeted and Non-budgeted Causal Banditscited by 38
  6. 2021Causal Bandits with Unknown Graph Structurecited by 37
  7. 2017Causal inference for social network datacited by 30
  8. 2022Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimizationcited by 26
  9. 2022Causal Bandits for Linear Structural Equation Modelscited by 19
  10. 2022Adaptively Exploiting d-Separators with Causal Banditscited by 18
  11. 2020Causal Bandits without prior knowledge using separating setscited by 17
  12. 2021A Causal Bandit Approach to Learning Good Atomic Interventions in Presence of Unobserved Confounderscited by 15
5 more
  1. 2017Multi-objective Contextual Multi-armed Bandit with a Dominant Objectivecited by 14
  2. 2023Additive Causal Bandits with Unknown Graphcited by 10
  3. 2015Personalized Course Sequence Recommendationscited by 9
  4. 2024Causal Bandits with General Causal Models and Interventionscited by 7
  5. 2023Robust Causal Bandits for Linear Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.