mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Models

arXiv 2107.02041 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2021cs.CV cs.GR eess.IVcited by 49

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To improve the viewer's Quality of Experience (QoE) and optimize computer graphics applications, 3D model quality assessment (3D-QA) has become an important task in the multimedia area. Point cloud and mesh are the two most widely used digital representation formats of 3D models, the visual quality of which is quite sensitive to lossy operations like simplification and compression. Therefore, many related studies such as point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) and mesh quality assessment (MQA) have been carried out to measure the visual quality degradations of 3D models. However, a large part of previous studies utilize full-reference (FR) metrics, which indicates they can not predict the quality level with the absence of the reference 3D model. Furthermore, few 3D-QA metrics consider color information, which significantly restricts their effectiveness and scope of application. In this paper, we propose a no-reference (NR) quality assessment metric for colored 3D models represented by both point cloud and mesh. First, we project the 3D models from 3D space into quality-related geometry and color feature domains. Then, the 3D natural scene statistics (3D-NSS) and entropy are utilized to extract quality-aware features. Finally, machine learning is employed to regress the quality-aware features into visual quality scores. Our method is validated on the colored point cloud quality assessment database (SJTU-PCQA), the Waterloo point cloud assessment database (WPC), and the colored mesh quality assessment database (CMDM). The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms most compared NR 3D-QA metrics with competitive computational resources and greatly reduces the performance gap with the state-of-the-art FR 3D-QA metrics. The code of the proposed model is publicly available now to facilitate further research.

Key facts. Cited by 49 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2021.

Builds on

7 of 60 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  2. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  3. 2020Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similaritycited by 57
  4. 2020Reduced Reference Perceptual Quality Model and Application to Rate Control for 3D Point Cloud Compressioncited by 31
  5. 2018Semantic Classification of 3D Point Clouds with Multiscale Spherical Neighborhoodscited by 21
  6. 2020A generalized Hausdorff distance based quality metric for point cloud geometrycited by 15
  7. 2021Subjective and Objective Visual Quality Assessment of Textured 3D Meshescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 11; 2023: 12; 2024: 13; 2025: 9; 2026: 4.

49 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 38
  2. 2023Advancing Zero-Shot Digital Human Quality Assessment through Text-Prompted Evaluationcited by 27
  3. 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
  4. 2022A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequencescited by 24
  5. 2022GPA-Net:No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Multi-task Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 22
  6. 2023Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Computer Graphics Imagescited by 21
  7. 2023GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 20
  8. 2024LMM-PCQA: Assisting Point Cloud Quality Assessment with LMMcited by 19
  9. 2022Deep Neural Network for Blind Visual Quality Assessment of 4K Contentcited by 14
  10. 2024Contrastive Pre-Training with Multi-View Fusion for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 14
  11. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Human Headscited by 13
  12. 2024AttentionLut: Attention Fusion-based Canonical Polyadic LUT for Real-time Image Enhancementcited by 11
37 more
  1. 2022DDH-QA: A Dynamic Digital Humans Quality Assessment Databasecited by 9
  2. 2023Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment of Point Clouds via Content-Oriented Saliency Projectioncited by 9
  3. 2023EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  4. 2024Dual-Branch Network for Portrait Image Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  5. 2022Blind Quality Assessment of 3D Dense Point Clouds with Structure Guided Resamplingcited by 7
  6. 2023Geometry-Aware Video Quality Assessment for Dynamic Digital Humancited by 7
  7. 2023A No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Digital Human Headcited by 6
  8. 20223D Face Morphing Attacks: Generation, Vulnerability and Detectioncited by 5
  9. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Fine-Grained Compressed Imagescited by 5
  10. 2023Simple Baselines for Projection-based Full-reference and No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  11. 2024No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 5
  12. 2025Affordance Benchmark for MLLMscited by 5
  13. 2022Progressive Knowledge Transfer Based on Human Visual Perception Mechanism for Perceptual Quality Assessment of Point Cloudscited by 4
  14. 2023GeodesicPSIM: Predicting the Quality of Static Mesh with Texture Map via Geodesic Patch Similaritycited by 4
  15. 2023No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Weighted Patch Quality Predictioncited by 3
  16. 2024Stochasticity-aware No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 3
  17. 2024Image-Guided Outdoor LiDAR Perception Quality Assessment for Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
  18. 2025DHQA-4D: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic 4D Digital Humancited by 3
  19. 2022Subjective Quality Assessment for Images Generated by Computer Graphicscited by 2
  20. 2024Full-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment Using Spectral Graph Waveletscited by 2
  21. 2024Full reference point cloud quality assessment using support vector regressioncited by 2
  22. 2024Learning Disentangled Representations for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Mutual Information Minimizationcited by 2
  23. 2024HybridMQA: Exploring Geometry-Texture Interactions for Colored Mesh Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  24. 2025From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Trainingcited by 1
  25. 2025No-reference geometry quality assessment for colorless point clouds via list-wise rank learningcited by 1
  26. 2025Low-Complexity Patch-based No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Metric exploiting Weighted Structure and Texture Featurescited by 1
  27. 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 1
  28. 2026UPDA: Unsupervised Progressive Domain Adaptation for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  29. 2023Efficient Cloud Pipelines for Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 0
  30. 2023Activating Frequency and ViT for 3D Point Cloud Quality Assessment without Referencecited by 0
  31. 2024Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Cloudscited by 0
  32. 2025Textured mesh Quality Assessment using Geometry and Color Field Similaritycited by 0
  33. 2025Point Cloud Quality Assessment Using the Perceptual Clustering Weighted Graph (PCW-Graph) and Attention Fusion Networkcited by 0
  34. 2025SRAM: Shape-Realism Alignment Metric for No Reference 3D Shape Evaluationcited by 0
  35. 2026GT-PCQA: Geometry-Texture Decoupled Point Cloud Quality Assessment with MLLMcited by 0
  36. 2026A3: Towards Advertising Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 0
  37. 2026PCQA-R1: Advancing Generalized 3D Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Reinforcement Learningcited by 0