mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Neural Network for Blind Visual Quality Assessment of 4K Content

arXiv 2206.04363 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2022cs.MM cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The 4K content can deliver a more immersive visual experience to consumers due to the huge improvement of spatial resolution. However, existing blind image quality assessment (BIQA) methods are not suitable for the original and upscaled 4K contents due to the expanded resolution and specific distortions. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based BIQA model for 4K content, which on one hand can recognize true and pseudo 4K content and on the other hand can evaluate their perceptual visual quality. Considering the characteristic that high spatial resolution can represent more abundant high-frequency information, we first propose a Grey-level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) based texture complexity measure to select three representative image patches from a 4K image, which can reduce the computational complexity and is proven to be very effective for the overall quality prediction through experiments. Then we extract different kinds of visual features from the intermediate layers of the convolutional neural network (CNN) and integrate them into the quality-aware feature representation. Finally, two multilayer perception (MLP) networks are utilized to map the quality-aware features into the class probability and the quality score for each patch respectively. The overall quality index is obtained through the average pooling of patch results. The proposed model is trained through the multi-task learning manner and we introduce an uncertainty principle to balance the losses of the classification and regression tasks. The experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms all compared BIQA metrics on four 4K content quality assessment databases.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.

Builds on

20 of 99 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  8. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  9. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  10. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
  11. 2016Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolutioncited by 144
  12. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
8 more
  1. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 129
  2. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  3. 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Modelscited by 50
  4. 2021Deep Learning based Full-reference and No-reference Quality Assessment Models for Compressed UGC Videoscited by 27
  5. 2021Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Structural Fidelity Versus Statistical Naturalnesscited by 15
  6. 2019Learning to Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 14
  7. 2018From Rank Estimation to Rank Approximation: Rank Residual Constraint for Image Restorationcited by 9
  8. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Fine-Grained Compressed Imagescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: