Simple Baselines for Projection-based Full-reference and No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Point clouds are widely used in 3D content representation and have various applications in multimedia. However, compression and simplification processes inevitably result in the loss of quality-aware information under storage and bandwidth constraints. Therefore, there is an increasing need for effective methods to quantify the degree of distortion in point clouds. In this paper, we propose simple baselines for projection-based point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) to tackle this challenge. We use multi-projections obtained via a common cube-like projection process from the point clouds for both full-reference (FR) and no-reference (NR) PCQA tasks. Quality-aware features are extracted with popular vision backbones. The FR quality representation is computed as the similarity between the feature maps of reference and distorted projections while the NR quality representation is obtained by simply squeezing the feature maps of distorted projections with average pooling The corresponding quality representations are regressed into visual quality scores by fully-connected layers. Taking part in the ICIP 2023 PCVQA Challenge, we succeeded in achieving the top spot in four out of the five competition tracks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.
Builds on
13 of 23 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 703
- 2020Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similaritycited by 57
- 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Modelscited by 49
- 2022NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
- 2023Advancing Zero-Shot Digital Human Quality Assessment through Text-Prompted Evaluationcited by 27
- 2022A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequencescited by 24
- 2022Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metriccited by 22
- 2023BASICS: Broad quality Assessment of Static point clouds In Compression Scenarioscited by 20
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
- 2024MEMO-Bench: A Multiple Benchmark for Text-to-Image and Multimodal Large Language Models on Human Emotion Analysiscited by 10
- 20243DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contentscited by 5
- 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 1
- 2025Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Headscited by 1
- 2025Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Heads31 Jul 2025
- 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey28 Jun 2025
- 2024MEMO-Bench: A Multiple Benchmark for Text-to-Image and Multimodal Large Language Models on Human Emotion Analysis18 Nov 2024
- 20243DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contents11 Sep 2024
- 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey17 Aug 2024