mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Computer Graphics Images

arXiv 2303.08050 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2023cs.CV eess.IVcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer graphics images (CGIs) are artificially generated by means of computer programs and are widely perceived under various scenarios, such as games, streaming media, etc. In practice, the quality of CGIs consistently suffers from poor rendering during production, inevitable compression artifacts during the transmission of multimedia applications, and low aesthetic quality resulting from poor composition and design. However, few works have been dedicated to dealing with the challenge of computer graphics image quality assessment (CGIQA). Most image quality assessment (IQA) metrics are developed for natural scene images (NSIs) and validated on databases consisting of NSIs with synthetic distortions, which are not suitable for in-the-wild CGIs. To bridge the gap between evaluating the quality of NSIs and CGIs, we construct a large-scale in-the-wild CGIQA database consisting of 6,000 CGIs (CGIQA-6k) and carry out the subjective experiment in a well-controlled laboratory environment to obtain the accurate perceptual ratings of the CGIs. Then, we propose an effective deep learning-based no-reference (NR) IQA model by utilizing both distortion and aesthetic quality representation. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms all other state-of-the-art NR IQA methods on the constructed CGIQA-6k database and other CGIQA-related databases. The database is released at https://github.com/zzc-1998/CGIQA6K.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2023.

Builds on

26 of 99 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  7. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  8. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  9. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  10. 2019Selective Kernel Networkscited by 401
  11. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  12. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
14 more
  1. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 314
  2. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  3. 2018BAM: Bottleneck Attention Modulecited by 171
  4. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  5. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 122
  6. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  7. 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Modelscited by 49
  8. 2022MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 38
  9. 2017A-Lamp: Adaptive Layout-Aware Multi-Patch Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Photo Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 28
  10. 2022A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequencescited by 24
  11. 2022Deep Neural Network for Blind Visual Quality Assessment of 4K Contentcited by 14
  12. 2018A Gated Peripheral-Foveal Convolutional Neural Network for Unified Image Aesthetic Predictioncited by 11
  13. 2021Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Gaming Videocited by 8
  14. 2020No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Feature Fusion and Multi-Task Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Visioncited by 247
  2. 2023Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Modelscited by 152
  3. 2024Towards Open-ended Visual Quality Comparisoncited by 85
  4. 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
  5. 2023Q-Boost: On Visual Quality Assessment Ability of Low-level Multi-Modality Foundation Modelscited by 22
  6. 2023GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 20
  7. 2024VisualCritic: Making LMMs Perceive Visual Quality Like Humanscited by 13
  8. 2025Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preferencecited by 12
  9. 2024AttentionLut: Attention Fusion-based Canonical Polyadic LUT for Real-time Image Enhancementcited by 11
  10. 2024MEMO-Bench: A Multiple Benchmark for Text-to-Image and Multimodal Large Language Models on Human Emotion Analysiscited by 10
  11. 2024THQA: A Perceptual Quality Assessment Database for Talking Headscited by 8
  12. 2024Q-Bench+: A Benchmark for Multi-modal Foundation Models on Low-level Vision from Single Images to Pairscited by 7
9 more
  1. 2024CMC-Bench: Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compressioncited by 6
  2. 2025Q-Adapt: Adapting LMM for Visual Quality Assessment with Progressive Instruction Tuningcited by 6
  3. 20243DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contentscited by 5
  4. 2026SIQA: Toward Reliable Scientific Image Quality Assessmentcited by 4
  5. 2025FD-LSCIC: Frequency Decomposition-based Learned Screen Content Image Compressioncited by 1
  6. 2025Computational Analysis of Degradation Modeling in Blind Panoramic Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  7. 2025Mitigating Low-Level Visual Hallucinations Requires Self-Awareness: Database, Model and Training Strategycited by 1
  8. 2026Q-Bench-Portrait: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Portrait Image Quality Perceptioncited by 1
  9. 2026R4-CGQA: Retrieval-based Vision Language Models for Computer Graphics Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0