mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

We Can Always Catch You: Detecting Adversarial Patched Objects WITH or WITHOUT Signature

arXiv 2106.05261 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, object detection has proven vulnerable to adversarial patch attacks. The attackers holding a specially crafted patch can hide themselves from state-of-the-art detectors, e.g., YOLO, even in the physical world. This attack can bring serious security threats, such as escaping from surveillance cameras. How to effectively detect this kind of adversarial examples to catch potential attacks has become an important problem. In this paper, we propose two detection methods: the signature-based method and the signature-independent method. First, we identify two signatures of existing adversarial patches that can be utilized to precisely locate patches within adversarial examples. By employing the signatures, a fast signature-based method is developed to detect the adversarial objects. Second, we present a robust signature-independent method based on the textitcontent semantics consistency of model outputs. Adversarial objects violate this consistency, appearing locally but disappearing globally, while benign ones remain consistently present. The experiments demonstrate that two proposed methods can effectively detect attacks both in the digital and physical world. These methods each offer distinct advantage. Specifically, the signature-based method is capable of real-time detection, while the signature-independent method can detect unknown adversarial patch attacks and makes defense-aware attacks almost impossible to perform.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.

Builds on

47 of 84 references.

References · 47

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  6. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  10. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  11. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  12. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
35 more
  1. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  2. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  4. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  5. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  6. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  7. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  8. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  9. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  10. 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
  11. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  12. 2020Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling Cross Stage Partial Networkcited by 211
  13. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  14. 2019AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID systemcited by 161
  15. 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
  16. 2017Deep Text Classification Can be Fooledcited by 105
  17. 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
  18. 2019Universal Physical Camouflage Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 91
  19. 2021You Only Learn One Representation: Unified Network for Multiple Taskscited by 86
  20. 2017A General Framework for Adversarial Examples with Objectivescited by 82
  21. 2020Patch-wise Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networkcited by 78
  22. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  23. 2017SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustlycited by 76
  24. 2019Adversarial Objects Against LiDAR-Based Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 62
  25. 2018On the Suitability of Lp-norms for Creating and Preventing Adversarial Examplescited by 57
  26. 2017Detecting Adversarial Image Examples in Deep Networks with Adaptive Noise Reductioncited by 49
  27. 2015A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examplescited by 43
  28. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Examples Based on Spatial Consistency Information for Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
  29. 2017Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attackcited by 39
  30. 2019Role of Spatial Context in Adversarial Robustness for Object Detectioncited by 35
  31. 2021DetectorGuard: Provably Securing Object Detectors against Localized Patch Hiding Attackscited by 28
  32. 2019On Training Robust PDF Malware Classifierscited by 19
  33. 2021Adversarial YOLO: Defense Human Detection Patch Attacks via Detecting Adversarial Patchescited by 17
  34. 2018Detecting Deceptive Reviews using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 11
  35. 2014Color image quality assessment measure using multivariate generalized Gaussian distributioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.