Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As recommender systems become increasingly central for sorting and prioritizing the content available online, they have a growing impact on the opportunities or revenue of their items producers. For instance, they influence which recruiter a resume is recommended to, or to whom and how much a music track, video or news article is being exposed. This calls for recommendation approaches that not only maximize (a proxy of) user satisfaction, but also consider some notion of fairness in the exposure of items or groups of items. Formally, such recommendations are usually obtained by maximizing a concave objective function in the space of randomized rankings. When the total exposure of an item is defined as the sum of its exposure over users, the optimal rankings of every users become coupled, which makes the optimization process challenging. Existing approaches to find these rankings either solve the global optimization problem in a batch setting, i.e., for all users at once, which makes them inapplicable at scale, or are based on heuristics that have weak theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we propose the first efficient online algorithm to optimize concave objective functions in the space of rankings which applies to every concave and smooth objective function, such as the ones found for fairness of exposure. Based on online variants of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, we show that our algorithm is computationally fast, generating rankings on-the-fly with computation cost dominated by the sort operation, memory efficient, and has strong theoretical guarantees. Compared to baseline policies that only maximize user-side performance, our algorithm allows to incorporate complex fairness of exposure criteria in the recommendations with negligible computational overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2022.
Builds on
27 of 49 references.
References · 27
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,142
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,110
- 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
- 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
- 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 78
- 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
- 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 70
- 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
- 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 67
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 42
15 more
- 2021Fairness for Unobserved Characteristics: Insights from Technological Impacts on Queer Communitiescited by 40
- 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32
- 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
- 2021What are you optimizing for? Aligning Recommender Systems with Human Valuescited by 29
- 2021Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancecited by 28
- 2019FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Resultscited by 22
- 2021Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Adscited by 16
- 2017Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across Demographicscited by 12
- 2018Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendationscited by 11
- 2021Maximizing Marginal Fairness for Dynamic Learning to Rankcited by 10
- 2021Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilitiescited by 9
- 2017Fast Rates for Bandit Optimization with Upper-Confidence Frank-Wolfecited by 7
- 2018Frank-Wolfe with Subsampling Oraclecited by 6
- 2015On the Online Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Convex and Non-convex Optimizationscited by 4
- 2021Unbiased Cascade Bandits: Mitigating Exposure Bias in Online Learning to Rank Recommendationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3.
5 papers.
- 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
- 2024FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systemscited by 6
- 2022Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair rankingcited by 2
- 2024System-2 Recommenders: Disentangling Utility and Engagement in Recommendation Systems via Temporal Point-Processescited by 2
- 2024(Unfair) Norms in Fairness Research: A Meta-Analysiscited by 1
- 2024FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems3 Jul 2024
- 2024(Unfair) Norms in Fairness Research: A Meta-Analysis17 Jun 2024
- 2024System-2 Recommenders: Disentangling Utility and Engagement in Recommendation Systems via Temporal Point-Processes29 May 2024
- 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Tools29 Sep 2023
- 2022Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair ranking18 Oct 2022