mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Complex Factoid Question Answering with a Free-Text Knowledge Graph

arXiv 2103.12876 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2021cs.CL cs.IRcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce DELFT, a factoid question answering system which combines the nuance and depth of knowledge graph question answering approaches with the broader coverage of free-text. DELFT builds a free-text knowledge graph from Wikipedia, with entities as nodes and sentences in which entities co-occur as edges. For each question, DELFT finds the subgraph linking question entity nodes to candidates using text sentences as edges, creating a dense and high coverage semantic graph. A novel graph neural network reasons over the free-text graph-combining evidence on the nodes via information along edge sentences-to select a final answer. Experiments on three question answering datasets show DELFT can answer entity-rich questions better than machine reading based models, bert-based answer ranking and memory networks. DELFT's advantage comes from both the high coverage of its free-text knowledge graph-more than double that of dbpedia relations-and the novel graph neural network which reasons on the rich but noisy free-text evidence.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2021.

Builds on

29 of 63 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  5. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  8. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  9. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  10. 2014Memory Networkscited by 354
  11. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  12. 2016Key-Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documentscited by 223
17 more
  1. 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
  2. 2018Open Domain Question Answering Using Early Fusion of Knowledge Bases and Textcited by 167
  3. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
  4. 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
  5. 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
  6. 2019Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoringcited by 119
  7. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
  8. 2019Cognitive Graph for Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension at Scalecited by 65
  9. 2019Dynamically Fused Graph Network for Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 63
  10. 2014Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddingscited by 56
  11. 2018Question Answering by Reasoning Across Documents with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 56
  12. 2019Multi-hop Reading Comprehension across Multiple Documents by Reasoning over Heterogeneous Graphscited by 53
  13. 2018Efficient and Robust Question Answering from Minimal Context over Documentscited by 26
  14. 2019Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?cited by 25
  15. 2019Answering Complex Questions by Joining Multi-Document Evidence with Quasi Knowledge Graphscited by 21
  16. 2019Coarse-grain Fine-grain Coattention Network for Multi-evidence Question Answeringcited by 12
  17. 2016Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledgecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: