mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Identifying Physical Law of Hamiltonian Systems via Meta-Learning

arXiv 2102.11544 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2021cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hamiltonian mechanics is an effective tool to represent many physical processes with concise yet well-generalized mathematical expressions. A well-modeled Hamiltonian makes it easy for researchers to analyze and forecast many related phenomena that are governed by the same physical law. However, in general, identifying a functional or shared expression of the Hamiltonian is very difficult. It requires carefully designed experiments and the researcher's insight that comes from years of experience. We propose that meta-learning algorithms can be potentially powerful data-driven tools for identifying the physical law governing Hamiltonian systems without any mathematical assumptions on the representation, but with observations from a set of systems governed by the same physical law. We show that a well meta-trained learner can identify the shared representation of the Hamiltonian by evaluating our method on several types of physical systems with various experimental settings.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.

Builds on

34 of 51 references.

References · 34

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  4. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  5. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  6. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  7. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  8. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  9. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 867
  10. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  11. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  12. 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
22 more
  1. 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
  2. 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
  3. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  4. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  5. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 345
  6. 2018Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systemscited by 339
  7. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
  8. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  9. 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 242
  10. 2019Meta-Learning Representations for Continual Learningcited by 189
  11. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 183
  12. 2018Meta-Gradient Reinforcement Learningcited by 156
  13. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  14. 2019Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 148
  15. 2019Hamiltonian Generative Networkscited by 136
  16. 2019Hamiltonian Graph Networks with ODE Integratorscited by 107
  17. 2019Meta-Learning with Warped Gradient Descentcited by 98
  18. 2020Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learningcited by 77
  19. 2020Meta-Learning Symmetries by Reparameterizationcited by 75
  20. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 70
  21. 2019Learning Symbolic Physics with Graph Networkscited by 52
  22. 2019Data-driven discovery of free-form governing differential equationscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

8 papers.