The Effectiveness of Random Forgetting for Robust Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarial attacks, which can compromise their performance and accuracy. Adversarial Training (AT) has emerged as a popular approach for protecting neural networks against such attacks. However, a key challenge of AT is robust overfitting, where the network's robust performance on test data deteriorates with further training, thus hindering generalization. Motivated by the concept of active forgetting in the brain, we introduce a novel learning paradigm called "Forget to Mitigate Overfitting (FOMO)". FOMO alternates between the forgetting phase, which randomly forgets a subset of weights and regulates the model's information through weight reinitialization, and the relearning phase, which emphasizes learning generalizable features. Our experiments on benchmark datasets and adversarial attacks show that FOMO alleviates robust overfitting by significantly reducing the gap between the best and last robust test accuracy while improving the state-of-the-art robustness. Furthermore, FOMO provides a better trade-off between standard and robust accuracy, outperforming baseline adversarial methods. Finally, our framework is robust to AutoAttacks and increases generalization in many real-world scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2024.
Builds on
31 of 47 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
19 more
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
- 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 183
- 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 142
- 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 76
- 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
- 2019The Limitations of Adversarial Training and the Blind-Spot Attackcited by 63
- 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
- 2022Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and Beyondcited by 51
- 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2021Subspace Adversarial Trainingcited by 41
- 2021The Impact of Reinitialization on Generalization in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2019Biologically inspired sleep algorithm for artificial neural networkscited by 10
- 2021Guided Interpolation for Adversarial Trainingcited by 8
- 2021Identifying Layers Susceptible to Adversarial Attackscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.