mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MixACM: Mixup-Based Robustness Transfer via Distillation of Activated Channel Maps

arXiv 2111.05073 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarially crafted, small and imperceptible changes in the natural inputs. The most effective defense mechanism against these examples is adversarial training which constructs adversarial examples during training by iterative maximization of loss. The model is then trained to minimize the loss on these constructed examples. This min-max optimization requires more data, larger capacity models, and additional computing resources. It also degrades the standard generalization performance of a model. Can we achieve robustness more efficiently? In this work, we explore this question from the perspective of knowledge transfer. First, we theoretically show the transferability of robustness from an adversarially trained teacher model to a student model with the help of mixup augmentation. Second, we propose a novel robustness transfer method called Mixup-Based Activated Channel Maps (MixACM) Transfer. MixACM transfers robustness from a robust teacher to a student by matching activated channel maps generated without expensive adversarial perturbations. Finally, extensive experiments on multiple datasets and different learning scenarios show our method can transfer robustness while also improving generalization on natural images.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 84 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2021.

Builds on

84 of 99 references.

References · 84

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  10. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  11. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  12. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
38 more
  1. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
  2. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  3. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  4. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  5. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
  6. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  7. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  8. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  9. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  10. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 734
  11. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  12. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  13. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  14. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  15. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  16. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  17. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  18. 2019Similarity-Preserving Knowledge Distillationcited by 507
  19. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  20. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  21. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  22. 2019A Comprehensive Overhaul of Feature Distillationcited by 341
  23. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  24. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  25. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  26. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  27. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  28. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  29. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
  30. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  31. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  32. 2018Knowledge Transfer via Distillation of Activation Boundaries Formed by Hidden Neuronscited by 235
  33. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  34. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  35. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  36. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  37. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  38. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162

50 most cited of 84 All 84 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.