mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacy

arXiv 2012.03893 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.CRcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we prove that the sample complexity of properly learning a class of Littlestone dimension d with approximate differential privacy is tilde O(d6), ignoring privacy and accuracy parameters. This result answers a question of Bun et al. (FOCS 2020) by improving upon their upper bound of 2O(d) on the sample complexity. Prior to our work, finiteness of the sample complexity for privately learning a class of finite Littlestone dimension was only known for improper private learners, and the fact that our learner is proper answers another question of Bun et al., which was also asked by Bousquet et al. (NeurIPS 2020). Using machinery developed by Bousquet et al., we then show that the sample complexity of sanitizing a binary hypothesis class is at most polynomial in its Littlestone dimension and dual Littlestone dimension. This implies that a class is sanitizable if and only if it has finite Littlestone dimension. An important ingredient of our proofs is a new property of binary hypothesis classes that we call irreducibility, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

29 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept Classescited by 59
  2. 2023Stability is Stable: Connections between Replicability, Privacy, and Adaptive Generalizationcited by 42
  3. 2021Majorizing Measures, Sequential Complexities, and Online Learningcited by 17
  4. 2023Statistical Indistinguishability of Learning Algorithmscited by 17
  5. 2023Local Borsuk-Ulam, Stability, and Replicabilitycited by 14
  6. 2023User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per Usercited by 12
  7. 2021Private learning implies quantum stabilitycited by 10
  8. 2021Littlestone Classes are Privately Online Learnablecited by 10
  9. 2021User-Level Private Learning via Correlated Samplingcited by 9
  10. 2022Comparative Learning: A Sample Complexity Theory for Two Hypothesis Classescited by 8
  11. 2023Replicability and stability in learningcited by 8
  12. 2022Finite Littlestone Dimension Implies Finite Information Complexitycited by 7
17 more
  1. 2024On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learningcited by 7
  2. 2024Oracle-Efficient Differentially Private Learning with Public Datacited by 5
  3. 2024On the Growth of Mistakes in Differentially Private Online Learning: A Lower Bound Perspectivecited by 5
  4. 2024The Limits of Differential Privacy in Online Learningcited by 5
  5. 2021Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC Learningcited by 4
  6. 2022The unstable formula theorem revisited via algorithmscited by 4
  7. 2024Private PAC Learning May be Harder than Online Learningcited by 4
  8. 2025Borsuk-Ulam and Replicable Learning of Large-Margin Halfspacescited by 3
  9. 2025Private Learning of Littlestone Classes, Revisitedcited by 3
  10. 2024Agnostic Private Density Estimation for GMMs via List Global Stabilitycited by 2
  11. 2025An tildeOptimal Differentially Private Learner for Concept Classes with VC Dimension 1cited by 2
  12. 2026Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisitedcited by 2
  13. 2024Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacycited by 1
  14. 2025Private Online Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: Realizable and Agnostic Settingscited by 1
  15. 2025Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 1
  16. 2026Tight list replicability bounds via a novel sphere covering theoremcited by 1
  17. 2026Expressivity of Contradiction Graphscited by 0