Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The realizable-to-agnostic transformation (Beimel et al., 2015; Alon et al., 2020) provides a general mechanism to convert a private learner in the realizable setting (where the examples are labeled by some function in the concept class) to a private learner in the agnostic setting (where no assumptions are imposed on the data). Specifically, for any concept class C and error parameter α, a private realizable learner for C can be transformed into a private agnostic learner while only increasing the sample complexity by widetildeO(VC(C)/α2), which is essentially tight assuming a constant privacy parameter varepsilon = Theta(1). However, when varepsilon can be arbitrary, one has to apply the standard privacy-amplification-by-subsampling technique (Kasiviswanathan et al., 2011), resulting in a suboptimal extra sample complexity of widetildeO(VC(C)/α2varepsilon) that involves a 1/varepsilon factor. In this work, we give an improved construction that eliminates the dependence on varepsilon, thereby achieving a near-optimal extra sample complexity of widetildeO(VC(C)/α2) for any varepsilon≤ 1. Moreover, our result reveals that in private agnostic learning, the privacy cost is only significant for the realizable part. We also leverage our technique to obtain a nearly tight sample complexity bound for the private prediction problem, resolving an open question posed by Dwork and Feldman (2018) and Dagan and Feldman (2020).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
- 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
- 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
- 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 64
- 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 60
- 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
- 2019A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guaranteescited by 36
- 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
- 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
- 2016Max-Information, Differential Privacy, and Post-Selection Hypothesis Testingcited by 27
- 2017Generalization for Adaptively-chosen Estimators via Stable Mediancited by 26
- 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
4 more
- 2020Closure Properties for Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 16
- 2014Learning Privately with Labeled and Unlabeled Examplescited by 10
- 2019PAC learning with stable and private predictionscited by 9
- 2024Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.