mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Private Realizable-to-Agnostic Transformation with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity

arXiv 2510.01291 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The realizable-to-agnostic transformation (Beimel et al., 2015; Alon et al., 2020) provides a general mechanism to convert a private learner in the realizable setting (where the examples are labeled by some function in the concept class) to a private learner in the agnostic setting (where no assumptions are imposed on the data). Specifically, for any concept class C and error parameter α, a private realizable learner for C can be transformed into a private agnostic learner while only increasing the sample complexity by widetildeO(VC(C)/α2), which is essentially tight assuming a constant privacy parameter varepsilon = Theta(1). However, when varepsilon can be arbitrary, one has to apply the standard privacy-amplification-by-subsampling technique (Kasiviswanathan et al., 2011), resulting in a suboptimal extra sample complexity of widetildeO(VC(C)/α2varepsilon) that involves a 1/varepsilon factor. In this work, we give an improved construction that eliminates the dependence on varepsilon, thereby achieving a near-optimal extra sample complexity of widetildeO(VC(C)/α2) for any varepsilon≤ 1. Moreover, our result reveals that in private agnostic learning, the privacy cost is only significant for the realizable part. We also leverage our technique to obtain a nearly tight sample complexity bound for the private prediction problem, resolving an open question posed by Dwork and Feldman (2018) and Dagan and Feldman (2020).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
  2. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  3. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
  4. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 64
  5. 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 60
  6. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  7. 2019A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guaranteescited by 36
  8. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  9. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  10. 2016Max-Information, Differential Privacy, and Post-Selection Hypothesis Testingcited by 27
  11. 2017Generalization for Adaptively-chosen Estimators via Stable Mediancited by 26
  12. 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
4 more
  1. 2020Closure Properties for Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 16
  2. 2014Learning Privately with Labeled and Unlabeled Examplescited by 10
  3. 2019PAC learning with stable and private predictionscited by 9
  4. 2024Improved Bounds for Pure Private Agnostic Learning: Item-Level and User-Level Privacycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.