mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Private learning implies quantum stability

arXiv 2102.07171 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2021quant-ph cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning an unknown n-qubit quantum state ρ is a fundamental challenge in quantum computing. Information-theoretically, it is known that tomography requires exponential in n many copies of ρ to estimate it up to trace distance. Motivated by computational learning theory, Aaronson et al. introduced many (weaker) learning models: the PAC model of learning states (Proceedings of Royal Society A'07), shadow tomography (STOC'18) for learning "shadows" of a state, a model that also requires learners to be differentially private (STOC'19) and the online model of learning states (NeurIPS'18). In these models it was shown that an unknown state can be learned "approximately" using linear-in-n many copies of rho. But is there any relationship between these models? In this paper we prove a sequence of (information-theoretic) implications from differentially-private PAC learning, to communication complexity, to online learning and then to quantum stability. Our main result generalizes the recent work of Bun, Livni and Moran (Journal of the ACM'21) who showed that finite Littlestone dimension (of Boolean-valued concept classes) implies PAC learnability in the (approximate) differentially private (DP) setting. We first consider their work in the real-valued setting and further extend their techniques to the setting of learning quantum states. Key to our results is our generic quantum online learner, Robust Standard Optimal Algorithm (RSOA), which is robust to adversarial imprecision. We then show information-theoretic implications between DP learning quantum states in the PAC model, learnability of quantum states in the one-way communication model, online learning of quantum states, quantum stability (which is our conceptual contribution), various combinatorial parameters and give further applications to gentle shadow tomography and noisy quantum state learning.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2021.

Builds on

21 of 62 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
  2. 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 81
  3. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 73
  4. 2020An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 63
  5. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 55
  6. 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
  7. 2020Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private Learningcited by 47
  8. 2018Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 37
  9. 2015Simultaneous Private Learning of Multiple Conceptscited by 34
  10. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  11. 2020Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacycited by 29
  12. 2014Characterizing the Sample Complexity of Private Learnerscited by 19
9 more
  1. 2020Quantum statistical query learningcited by 19
  2. 2020Quantum Differentially Private Sparse Regression Learningcited by 18
  3. 2020Closure Properties for Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 15
  4. 2020On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary Classificationcited by 12
  5. 2019Private Learning Implies Online Learning: An Efficient Reductioncited by 10
  6. 2017Online Learning via the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 8
  7. 2020A Computational Separation between Private Learning and Online Learningcited by 8
  8. 2020Improved Quantum Boostingcited by 7
  9. 2019Synthetic Data Generators: Sequential and Privatecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 1.

10 papers.